Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Semiconductors
Chemicals
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Semiconductors | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $498M | $76M | $5.14B | $796M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $86M | $768M | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-306K | $3M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 37.0% | 48.0% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | -4.3% | 6.9% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4438.9x | 37.4x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $13M | $39M | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $7M | $216M | $20M |
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASP Isotopes Inc. C… (ASPI) | 100 | 249.2 | +149.2% |
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 61.5 | -38.5% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 204.7 | +104.7% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 58.3 | -41.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 100.0%
- Beta 2.70, yield 100.0%, current ratio 9.31x
- 8.6% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KLIC's 1.0%
NTIC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38 vs ASPI's 2.70, lower leverage
KLIC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs ASPI's 99.6%
- +220.8% vs ASPI's -3.1%
ASIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 4438.9x)
- 3.2% margin vs ASPI's -12.6%
- 2.9% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC 4.4% vs -98.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 4438.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ASPI's -12.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs ASPI's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KLIC's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.8% vs ASPI's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC 4.4% vs -98.6% |
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KLIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASIX leads 1 • ASPI leads 0 • NTIC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASIX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 181.6x ASPI's $8M. ASIX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASPI's -12.6%. On growth, ASPI holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $86M | $768M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$2M | $61M | $143M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$305,653 | $3M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$3M | $11M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +37.0% | +48.0% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -4.3% | +6.9% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -0.4% | +0.4% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -3.6% | +1.4% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +9.2% | +49.8% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -47.8% | +141.5% | -8.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ASIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 100% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASIX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLIC's 336.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $498M | $76M | $5.1B | $796M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $474M | $82M | $5.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.46x | 4438.89x | 9999.00x | 13.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 37.41x | 15.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 336.22x | 7.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 120.09x | 0.90x | 7.85x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.80x | 1.00x | 6.36x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 53.30x | 124.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KLIC and ASIX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ASPI. KLIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASPI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs NTIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -190.4% | -0.4% | +0.4% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.2% | -0.3% | +0.3% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.6% | -5.6% | -0.3% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.1% | -7.7% | -0.3% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.17x | 0.05x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $6M | -$177M | $361M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $7M | $216M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $13M | $39M | $381M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.41x | 5.11x | 4872.17x | 7.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KLIC five years ago would be worth $20,103 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,931 for NTIC. Over the past 12 months, KLIC leads with a +220.8% total return vs ASPI's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASPI at 110.7% vs ASIX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.3% | -1.5% | +103.4% | +40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.1% | +10.9% | +220.8% | +8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +835.1% | -24.9% | +115.0% | -25.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.6% | -40.7% | +101.0% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.6% | +39.6% | +814.1% | +60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +110.7% | -9.1% | +29.1% | -9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTIC and KLIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASPI's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KLIC currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs ASPI's 36.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.38x | 1.87x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.49 | $10.03 | $107.01 | $26.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.92 | $7.10 | $29.91 | $14.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.8% | +79.7% | +91.7% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 44.8 | 77.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 10K | 617K | 453K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASPI and KLIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASPI as "Buy", KLIC as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.9% upside for ASPI (target: $13) vs -36.3% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, ASPI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs KLIC's 1.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | — | $62.50 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — | 11 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +2.0% | +1.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $49929.39 | $0.16 | $1.02 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% | +0.2% |
KLIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ASIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ASPI vs NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is the stronger pick with 857. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, AdvanSix Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
Over the past 5 years, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) delivered a total return of +101. 0%, compared to -40. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLIC returned +814. 1% versus NTIC's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning ASPI is approximately 617% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is pulling ahead at 857. 0% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTIC leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -780. 2% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASIX leads at 4. 4% versus -635. 9% for ASPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLIC leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASPI: 143. 9% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC).
09Is ASPI or NTIC or KLIC or ASIX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, ASPI: +99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASPI and NTIC and KLIC and ASIX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASPI (Basic Materials) and NTIC (Basic Materials) and KLIC (Technology) and ASIX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASPI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.