Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASX vs TFII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
ASX vs TFII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $74.84B | $11.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $666.14B | $8.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47.13B | $339M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 26.7x |
| Total Debt | $264.10B | $3.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92.47B | $210M |
ASX vs TFII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 839.0 | +739.0% |
| TFI International I… (TFII) | 100 | 459.6 | +359.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASX vs TFII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 70.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- PEG 0.13 vs TFII's 2.60
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 26.7x), PEG 0.13 vs 2.60
TFII is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 31.1%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.7%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs ASX's 7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.1% revenue growth vs ASX's 6.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 26.7x), PEG 0.13 vs 2.60 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs TFII's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs ASX's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ASX's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +276.8% vs TFII's +71.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs TFII's 4.7%, ROIC 7.6% vs 9.7% |
ASX vs TFII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASX vs TFII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 77.0x TFII's $8.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.1% (ASX) to 3.9% (TFII). On growth, TFII holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $666.1B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127.9B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47.1B | $339M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.2B | $778M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +12.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.1% | +23.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TFII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.8x trailing earnings, TFII trades at a 54% valuation discount to ASX's 58.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TFII offers better value at 2.61x vs ASX's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.8B | $11.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.3B | $14.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | 26.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | 26.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | 2.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.20x | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 4.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $13 for TFII. ASX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFII's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs TFII's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +12.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171.6B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92.5B | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264.1B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.27x | 3.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $46,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,536 for TFII. Over the past 12 months, ASX leads with a +276.8% total return vs TFII's +71.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 71.1% vs TFII's 10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +103.0% | +31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +276.8% | +71.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +400.9% | +36.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +368.1% | +65.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +703.9% | +713.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.1% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASX and TFII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TFII is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASX's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASX currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs TFII's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $149.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.12 | $80.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
TFII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASX as "Buy" and TFII as "Buy". For income investors, TFII offers the higher dividend yield at 1.82% vs ASX's 0.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.46 | $2.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% |
ASX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TFII leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ASX vs TFII: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASX or TFII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the stronger pick with 31. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX). TFI International Inc. (TFII) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (26. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASX or TFII?
On trailing P/E, TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the cheapest at 26. 8x versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. at 58. 2x. On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 13x versus TFI International Inc. 's 2. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASX or TFII?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to +65. 4% for TFI International Inc. (TFII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TFII returned +713. 0% versus ASX's +703. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASX or TFII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. 's 1. 60β — meaning ASX is approximately 23% more volatile than TFII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 138% for TFI International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASX or TFII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is pulling ahead at 31. 1% versus 6. 8% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 27. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for TFI International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TFII leads at 7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASX or TFII?
ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus 3. 9% for TFI International Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASX leads at 7. 9% versus 6. 9% for TFII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASX leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASX or TFII more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus TFI International Inc. 's 2. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for TFI International Inc. — 25. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASX or TFII?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TFI International Inc. (TFII) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 1. 0% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX).
09Is ASX or TFII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TFI International Inc.
(TFII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield, +713. 0% 10Y return). ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TFII: +713. 0%, ASX: +703. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASX and TFII?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASX (Technology) and TFII (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TFII is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.