Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASX vs AMKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
ASX vs AMKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $74.84B | $18.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $666.14B | $7.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47.13B | $436M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 14.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 36.1x |
| Total Debt | $264.10B | $1.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92.47B | $1.38B |
ASX vs AMKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 839.0 | +739.0% |
| Amkor Technology, I… (AMKR) | 100 | 724.1 | +624.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASX vs AMKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 27.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 70.7%, current ratio 1.28x
AMKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.0% 10Y total return vs ASX's 7.0%
- +327.5% vs ASX's +276.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% revenue growth vs AMKR's 6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 36.1x), PEG 0.13 vs 25.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs AMKR's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs AMKR's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMKR's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +327.5% vs ASX's +276.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs AMKR's 5.4%, ROIC 7.6% vs 7.6% |
ASX vs AMKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASX vs AMKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASX and AMKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 94.2x AMKR's $7.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.1% (ASX) to 6.2% (AMKR). On growth, AMKR holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $666.1B | $7.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127.9B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47.1B | $436M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.2B | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.1% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.1x trailing earnings, AMKR trades at a 12% valuation discount to ASX's 58.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ASX offers better value at 7.36x vs AMKR's 36.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.8B | $19.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.3B | $19.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | 51.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | 36.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | 36.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.20x | 17.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 99.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMKR. AMKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASX's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs AMKR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171.6B | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92.5B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264.1B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.27x | 7.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $46,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40,795 for AMKR. Over the past 12 months, AMKR leads with a +327.5% total return vs ASX's +276.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 71.1% vs AMKR's 53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +103.0% | +78.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +276.8% | +327.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +400.9% | +264.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +368.1% | +308.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +703.9% | +1299.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.1% | +53.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASX is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMKR's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASX currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs AMKR's 96.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 2.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $79.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.12 | $17.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASX as "Buy" and AMKR as "Hold". For income investors, ASX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.97% vs AMKR's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.46 | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AMKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ASX vs AMKR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASX or AMKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger pick with 6. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 2% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) offers the better valuation at 51. 1x trailing P/E (36. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASX or AMKR?
On trailing P/E, Amkor Technology, Inc.
(AMKR) is the cheapest at 51. 1x versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. at 58. 2x. On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 25. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASX or AMKR?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to +308. 0% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMKR returned +1299% versus ASX's +703. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASX or AMKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 2. 90β — meaning AMKR is approximately 81% more volatile than ASX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 71% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASX or AMKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is pulling ahead at 6. 8% versus 6. 2% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 27. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for Amkor Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASX leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASX or AMKR?
ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus 5. 6% for Amkor Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASX leads at 7. 9% versus 7. 0% for AMKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASX leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASX or AMKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 25. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 1x for Amkor Technology, Inc. — 35. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASX or AMKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR).
09Is ASX or AMKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +703. 9% 10Y return). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASX: +703. 9%, AMKR: +1299%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASX and AMKR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ASX pays a dividend while AMKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.