Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHR vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
ATHR vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $50M | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -312.1% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 80.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $364M |
ATHR vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aether Holdings, In… (ATHR) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHR vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 9.21x
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 9.21x
SLAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- 375.0% 10Y total return vs ATHR's -28.9%
- 34.3% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -8.3% margin vs ATHR's -301.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs SLAB's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.3% vs ATHR's -58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.1% ROA vs ATHR's -102.7%, ROIC -6.9% vs -24.7% |
ATHR vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATHR vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 574.9x ATHR's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -8.3% (SLAB) to -3.0% (ATHR). On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SLAB leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.10x | -109.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 35.97x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.97x | 6.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 109.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-122 for ATHR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLAB scores 5/9 vs ATHR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.2% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.7% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.7% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -140.4% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLAB five years ago would be worth $16,095 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,113 for ATHR. Over the past 12 months, SLAB leads with a +100.3% total return vs ATHR's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLAB at 16.7% vs ATHR's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.8% | +65.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.9% | +100.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +375.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHR and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLAB's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs ATHR's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.90 | $106.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.8% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 465K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SLAB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ATHR vs SLAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHR or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). Analysts rate Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATHR or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) delivered a total return of +61. 0%, compared to -28. 9% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLAB returned +375. 0% versus ATHR's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATHR or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aether Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (ATHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Silicon Laboratories Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning SLAB is approximately 66% more volatile than ATHR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATHR or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -265. 2% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATHR leads at -4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATHR or SLAB?
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 3% net margin versus -227. 5% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps -8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLAB leads at -9. 0% versus -235. 5% for ATHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATHR leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATHR or SLAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ATHR or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aether Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (ATHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHR: -28. 9%, SLAB: +375. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATHR and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.