Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHS vs GL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Life
ATHS vs GL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $5M | $11.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.68B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.71B | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $145M |
ATHS vs GL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athene Holding Ltd.… (ATHS) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Globe Life Inc. (GL) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHS vs GL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17
GL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 175.7% 10Y total return vs ATHS's 13.9%
- 19.4% margin vs ATHS's 10.6%
- +27.0% vs ATHS's +7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs GL's 3.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs ATHS's 10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs GL's 0.48 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.0% vs ATHS's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs ATHS's 0.6% |
ATHS vs GL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATHS vs GL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHS is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.7B annually — 4.3x GL's $6.0B. GL is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATHS's 10.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.7B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATHS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15.0B | $14.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 10.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.08x | 9.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $13 for ATHS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GL scores 8/9 vs ATHS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.0B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GL five years ago would be worth $14,826 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,393 for ATHS. Over the past 12 months, GL leads with a +27.0% total return vs ATHS's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GL at 12.8% vs ATHS's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +27.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +48.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +175.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.4% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GL's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $156.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.60 | $116.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 67.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 450K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, ATHS offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs GL's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $171.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $789.97 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.4% |
GL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ATHS vs GL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHS or GL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Globe Life Inc. (GL). Globe Life Inc. (GL) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Globe Life Inc. (GL) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATHS or GL?
Over the past 5 years, Globe Life Inc.
(GL) delivered a total return of +48. 3%, compared to +13. 9% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GL returned +173. 3% versus ATHS's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATHS or GL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Globe Life Inc. 's 0. 45β — meaning GL is approximately 155% more volatile than ATHS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATHS or GL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus 3. 8% for Globe Life Inc. (GL). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATHS or GL?
Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 10. 6% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GL leads at 24. 4% versus 0. 0% for ATHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GL leads at 33. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATHS or GL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Globe Life Inc. (GL).
07Is ATHS or GL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHS: +14. 1%, GL: +173. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATHS and GL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.