ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
Asset Management
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-1.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ATHS vs FG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$3.67B
5Y Perf.-33.2%
ATHS vs FG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ATHS | FG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $5M | $3.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.68B | $5.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.71B | $530M |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $1.49B |
ATHS vs FG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ATHS
FG
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athene Holding Ltd.… (ATHS) | 100 | 98.8 | -1.2% |
| F&G Annuities & Lif… (FG) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHS vs FG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ATHS leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
The Banking Pick
ATHS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
FG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 78.6% 10Y total return vs ATHS's 13.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATHS | 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs FG's 5.7% |
| Value | ATHS | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | ATHS | 10.6% margin vs FG's 9.0% |
| Stability / Safety | ATHS | Beta 0.17 vs FG's 1.02 |
| Dividends | ATHS | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FG's 3.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ATHS | +7.9% vs FG's -22.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ATHS | 0.6% ROA vs FG's 0.5% |
ATHS vs FG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
ATHS vs FG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLATHSLAGGINGFG
FGF&G Annuities & Life,…
2leads
ATHSAthene Holding Ltd. 7…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FG2/3
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ATHS3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ATHS4/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ATHS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHS is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.7B annually — 4.4x FG's $5.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.6% (ATHS) to 9.0% (FG).
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.7B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +82.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +9.9% |
FG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ATHS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15.0B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.08x | 0.79x |
ATHS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATHS delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for FG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FG scores 5/9 vs ATHS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.0B | $751M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.87x |
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FG five years ago would be worth $17,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,393 for ATHS. Over the past 12 months, ATHS leads with a +7.9% total return vs FG's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FG at 21.1% vs ATHS's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +77.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +78.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.4% | +21.1% |
FG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FG's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATHS currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FG's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $36.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.60 | $20.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 591K |
ATHS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATHS and FG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, ATHS offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs FG's 3.83%.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $789.97 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
Evenly matched — ATHS and FG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ATHS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallAthene Holding Ltd. 7.250% … (ATHS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ATHS vs FG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHS or FG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATHS or FG?
Over the past 5 years, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to +13. 9% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FG returned +78. 6% versus ATHS's +13. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATHS or FG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning FG is approximately 486% more volatile than ATHS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATHS or FG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus 5. 7% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATHS or FG?
Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus 4. 6% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FG leads at 5. 6% versus 0. 0% for ATHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FG leads at 30. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATHS or FG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 3. 8% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG).
07Is ATHS or FG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHS: +13. 9%, FG: +78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATHS and FG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ATHS: 24.1% · FG: 39.0%)Net Margin>
%
(ATHS: 10.6% · FG: 9.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.