Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATMV vs NHIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ATMV vs NHIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $33M | $221M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-476K | $3M |
| Forward P/E | 21.9x | 525.9x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $986K |
ATMV vs NHIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaVest Acquisiti… (ATMV) | 100 | 88.3 | -11.7% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATMV vs NHIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATMV is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 14.8% vs NHIC's 1.3%
- Lower P/E (21.9x vs 525.9x)
- 14.8% margin vs NHIC's 1.3%
NHIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.03
- EPS growth 131.2%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs ATMV's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (21.9x vs 525.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs NHIC's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs ATMV's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs ATMV's -11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs ATMV's -2.5%, ROIC -0.7% vs -1.9% |
ATMV vs NHIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATMV and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $833,081 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$476,106 | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51,618 | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ATMV and NHIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, ATMV trades at a 96% valuation discount to NHIC's 525.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $221M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $220M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.91x | 525.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.43x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1082.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMV delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $2 for NHIC.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$986,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4,215 | $986,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHIC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHIC five years ago would be worth $10,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,198 for ATMV. Over the past 12 months, NHIC leads with a +5.7% total return vs ATMV's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHIC at 2.1% vs ATMV's 0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.9% | +5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +6.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +6.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +6.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NHIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATMV's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NHIC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ATMV's 24.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.00 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.43 | $9.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.6M | 21K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
NHIC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 1 category is tied.
ATMV vs NHIC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATMV or NHIC a better buy right now?
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV) offers the better valuation at 21.
9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATMV or NHIC?
On trailing P/E, AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus NewHold Investment Corp III at 525. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATMV or NHIC?
Over the past 5 years, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) delivered a total return of +6.
4%, compared to +2. 0% for AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NHIC returned +6. 4% versus ATMV's +2. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATMV or NHIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
03β versus AlphaVest Acquisition Corp's 0. 64β — meaning ATMV is approximately 2036% more volatile than NHIC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ATMV or NHIC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewHold Investment Corp III grew EPS 131.
2% year-over-year, compared to 46. 9% for AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATMV or NHIC?
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for NewHold Investment Corp III — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATMV leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for NHIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATMV leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ATMV or NHIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ATMV or NHIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHIC: +6. 4%, ATMV: +2. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ATMV and NHIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.