Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATXS vs BCAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ATXS vs BCAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $718M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $706K | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-124M | $-60M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -193.4% | -29.7% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $7M |
ATXS vs BCAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astria Therapeutics… (ATXS) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATXS vs BCAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 30.6%
- -95.5% 10Y total return vs BCAB's -99.7%
- -21.7% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8%
BCAB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.51
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 0.37x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -21.7% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -29.8% margin vs ATXS's -175.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs ATXS's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.6% vs BCAB's -80.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.6% ROA vs BCAB's -250.6% |
ATXS vs BCAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2M annually — 2.8x ATXS's $706,000. BCAB is the more profitable business, keeping -29.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXS's -175.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $706,000 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | -$59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$124M | -$60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | -$34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -193.4% | -29.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -175.7% | -29.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -170.4% | -17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.9% | +46.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $718M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $664M | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.49x | -0.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.21x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATXS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCAB scores 2/9 vs ATXS's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.6% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | -$918,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATXS five years ago would be worth $10,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for BCAB. Over the past 12 months, ATXS leads with a +184.6% total return vs BCAB's -80.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATXS at -0.1% vs BCAB's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | -83.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +184.6% | -80.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.4% | -97.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -99.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | -70.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATXS and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATXS's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATXS currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs BCAB's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.29 | $71.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +6.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 40.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ATXS as "Hold" and BCAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5647.1% upside for BCAB (target: $250) vs 54.2% for ATXS (target: $19).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.40 | $250.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATXS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BCAB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ATXS vs BCAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATXS or BCAB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATXS or BCAB?
Over the past 5 years, Astria Therapeutics, Inc.
(ATXS) delivered a total return of +7. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATXS returned -95. 5% versus BCAB's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATXS or BCAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Astria Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning ATXS is approximately 160% more volatile than BCAB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATXS or BCAB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astria Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to 29. 9% for BioAtla, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATXS or BCAB?
BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the more profitable company, earning -29. 8% net margin versus -175. 7% for Astria Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCAB leads at -29. 7% versus -193. 4% for ATXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATXS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATXS or BCAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ATXS or BCAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAB: -99. 7%, ATXS: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATXS and BCAB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.