AU vs KGC

For growth investors, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the stronger pick with 70.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 39. 3% for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the cheapest at 15.

3x versus AngloGold Ashanti Plc at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, AngloGold Ashanti Plc is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AngloGold Ashanti Plc wins at 0. 54x versus Kinross Gold Corporation's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) delivered a total return of +357.

0%, compared to +301. 4% for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AU returned +653. 9% versus KGC's +499. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

69β versus AngloGold Ashanti Plc's 0. 79β — meaning AU is approximately 14% more volatile than KGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 25% for AngloGold Ashanti Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is pulling ahead at 70.

8% versus 39. 3% for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinross Gold Corporation grew EPS 158. 4% year-over-year, compared to 122. 7% for AngloGold Ashanti Plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AU leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

9% net margin versus 26. 6% for AngloGold Ashanti Plc — meaning it keeps 33. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AU leads at 45. 1% versus 43. 2% for KGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KGC leads at 47. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus Kinross Gold Corporation's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Kinross Gold Corporation — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KGC: 38. 9% to $42. 25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 4% for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 3. 7% yield, +653. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AU: +653. 9%, KGC: +499. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AU pays a dividend while KGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.