Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBY vs COST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
BBY vs COST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $12.29B | $448.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41.69B | $286.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $8.55B |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.13B | $8.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.74B | $14.16B |
BBY vs COST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Costco Wholesale Co… (COST) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBY vs COST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 6.5%
- Beta 1.08, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 49.5x)
COST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs BBY's 161.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 28.0%, current ratio 1.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs BBY's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs BBY's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs BBY's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs COST's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.0% vs BBY's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs BBY's 7.0%, ROIC 34.5% vs 18.7% |
BBY vs COST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBY vs COST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COST is the larger business by revenue, generating $286.3B annually — 6.9x BBY's $41.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (COST) to 2.6% (BBY). On growth, COST holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41.7B | $286.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $13.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $8.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +12.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BBY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BBY trades at a 79% valuation discount to COST's 55.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBY's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COST's 34.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.3B | $448.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.7B | $442.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.62x | 55.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.03x | 49.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.68x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.62x | 34.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.56x | 15.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.77x | 57.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COST leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY delivers a 36.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $29 for COST. COST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBY's 1.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.8% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.7% | +34.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | +27.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | -$6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $14.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $8.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.90x | 77.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COST five years ago would be worth $27,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,242 for BBY. Over the past 12 months, COST leads with a +1.0% total return vs BBY's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COST at 27.8% vs BBY's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.0% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.8% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.6% | +108.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +172.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | +625.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
COST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COST is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBY's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COST currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs BBY's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.99 | $1067.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.68 | $846.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
BBY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BBY as "Hold" and COST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for BBY (target: $75) vs 5.7% for COST (target: $1070). For income investors, BBY offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs COST's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.50 | $1070.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.78 | $4.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.2% |
COST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BBY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
BBY vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBY or COST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY). Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBY or COST?
On trailing P/E, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 6x. On forward P/E, Best Buy Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBY or COST?
Over the past 5 years, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) delivered a total return of +172.
8%, compared to -37. 6% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +625. 0% versus BBY's +161. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBY or COST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Best Buy Co. , Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning BBY is approximately 746% more volatile than COST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 118% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBY or COST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus 0. 4% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Best Buy Co. , Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to 10. 0% for Costco Wholesale Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COST leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBY or COST?
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
9% net margin versus 2. 6% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COST leads at 3. 8% versus 3. 3% for BBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBY leads at 22. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBY or COST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBY: 27. 3% to $74. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBY or COST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
09Is BBY or COST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), +625. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COST: +625. 0%, BBY: +161. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBY and COST?
These companies operate in different sectors (BBY (Consumer Cyclical) and COST (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BBY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BBY pays a dividend while COST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.