BGSF
BGSF, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-51.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BGSF vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$345M
5Y Perf.-34.7%
BGSF vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BGSF | KELYA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $57M | $345M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $4.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-254M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -21.7% | -1.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $33M |
BGSF vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BGSF
KELYA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGSF vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BGSF and KELYA are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Kelly Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BGSF
BGSF, Inc.
The Income Pick
BGSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 40.1%
- -16.5% 10Y total return vs KELYA's -33.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 4.12x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Growth Play
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth -427.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
- -1.9% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8%
- -6.0% margin vs BGSF's -21.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KELYA | -1.9% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8% |
| Quality / Margins | KELYA | -6.0% margin vs BGSF's -21.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BGSF | Beta 0.95 vs KELYA's 1.01, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BGSF | 40.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BGSF | +109.4% vs KELYA's -12.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KELYA | -11.3% ROA vs BGSF's -12.6%, ROIC -4.0% vs -8.5% |
BGSF vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BGSF vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBGSFLAGGINGKELYA
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
2leads
BGSFBGSF, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KELYAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KELYA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KELYA2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BGSF5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BGSF5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 83.4x BGSF's $51M. KELYA is the more profitable business, keeping -6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGSF's -21.2%. On growth, KELYA holds the edge at -11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$987,000 | $114M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.7% | -1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.0% | -11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -3.2% |
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $345M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $471M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.19x | -1.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.02x |
KELYA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BGSF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BGSF delivers a -19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-19 in annual profit, vs $-26 for KELYA. BGSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KELYA's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KELYA scores 5/9 vs BGSF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.3% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.6% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.8% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.88x | -5.02x |
BGSF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BGSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BGSF five years ago would be worth $6,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,202 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, BGSF leads with a +109.4% total return vs KELYA's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BGSF at -8.0% vs KELYA's -12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.4% | -12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | -33.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.5% | -33.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | -12.8% |
BGSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BGSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KELYA currently trades 65.5% from its 52-week high vs BGSF's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.22 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.20 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 352K |
Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BGSF offers the higher dividend yield at 40.13% vs KELYA's 3.20%.
| Metric | BGSFBGSF, Inc. | KELYAKelly Services, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +40.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.02 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +3.6% |
Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
KELYA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BGSF leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallBGSF, Inc. (BGSF)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BGSF vs KELYA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGSF or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BGSF or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, BGSF, Inc.
(BGSF) delivered a total return of -35. 3%, compared to -58. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BGSF returned -16. 5% versus KELYA's -33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BGSF or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BGSF, Inc.
(BGSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning KELYA is approximately 6% more volatile than BGSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 16% for Kelly Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BGSF or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BGSF, Inc. grew EPS -125. 8% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BGSF or KELYA?
Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 0% net margin versus -8. 3% for BGSF, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KELYA leads at -1. 6% versus -10. 0% for BGSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BGSF leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BGSF or KELYA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) offers the highest yield at 40. 1%, versus 3. 2% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA).
07Is BGSF or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BGSF, Inc.
(BGSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 40. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGSF: -16. 5%, KELYA: -33. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BGSF and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BGSF: -67.0% · KELYA: -11.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.