REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BHM vs AMH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
BHM vs AMH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $45M | $11.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $1.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $467M |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | 51.9% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $437M | $5.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $170M | $109M |
BHM vs AMH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bluerock Homes Trus… (BHM) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| American Homes 4 Re… (AMH) | 100 | 98.8 | -1.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHM vs AMH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BHM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.9%, EPS growth -174.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.2%
- 36.9% FFO/revenue growth vs AMH's 8.0%
- Better valuation composite
AMH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 3.8%
- 116.9% 10Y total return vs BHM's -41.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 66.5%, current ratio 62.90x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.9% FFO/revenue growth vs AMH's 8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.0% margin vs BHM's -11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs BHM's 0.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs AMH's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs BHM's -0.7%, ROIC 2.7% vs -2.0% |
BHM vs AMH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BHM vs AMH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BHM and AMH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 25.9x BHM's $72M. AMH is the more profitable business, keeping 25.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BHM's -11.0%. On growth, BHM holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $973M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $467M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $995,000 | $875M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +30.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +25.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +46.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BHM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMH's 17.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BHM's 50.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312M | $16.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.62x | 27.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.76x | 17.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.65x | 6.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.31x | 15.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMH delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BHM. BHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMH's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BHM scores 7/9 vs AMH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.3% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $268M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.43x | 3.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMH five years ago would be worth $9,858 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,901 for BHM. Over the past 12 months, BHM leads with a +10.3% total return vs AMH's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMH at 0.5% vs BHM's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | -13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | +1.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | -1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +116.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.2% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHM's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMH currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs BHM's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.81 | $39.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.05 | $27.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.8% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AMH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
AMH is the only dividend payer here at 3.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.4% |
AMH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BHM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BHM vs AMH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHM or AMH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.
(BHM) is the stronger pick with 36. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for American Homes 4 Rent (AMH). American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BHM or AMH?
Over the past 5 years, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) delivered a total return of -1.
4%, compared to -41. 0% for Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. (BHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMH returned +116. 9% versus BHM's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BHM or AMH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. 's 0. 32β — meaning BHM is approximately 93% more volatile than AMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. (BHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 66% for American Homes 4 Rent — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BHM or AMH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.
(BHM) is pulling ahead at 36. 9% versus 8. 0% for American Homes 4 Rent (AMH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Homes 4 Rent grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -174. 5% for Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BHM leads at 17. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BHM or AMH?
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
3% net margin versus 3. 3% for Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMH leads at 24. 2% versus -33. 8% for BHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMH leads at 3. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BHM or AMH?
In this comparison, AMH (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BHM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BHM or AMH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 3. 8% yield, +116. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMH: +116. 9%, BHM: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BHM and AMH?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BHM is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. AMH pays a dividend while BHM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.