BITF
Bitfarms Ltd.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.+526.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BITF vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$3.71B
5Y Perf.+323.4%
BITF vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BITF | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $3.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-261M |
| Gross Margin | -16.8% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -55.8% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $43M |
BITF vs CLSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BITF
CLSK
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) | 100 | 626.1 | +526.1% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 423.4 | +323.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BITF vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLSK leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Bitfarms Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BITF
Bitfarms Ltd.
The Banking Pick
BITF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 138.7% 10Y total return vs CLSK's -83.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.69, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 5.89x
- -28.0% margin vs CLSK's -33.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Income Pick
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.39, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- Beta 3.39, yield 0.2%, current ratio 4.18x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLSK | 102.2% revenue growth vs BITF's 31.8% |
| Quality / Margins | BITF | -28.0% margin vs CLSK's -33.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CLSK | Beta 3.39 vs BITF's 3.69 |
| Dividends | CLSK | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BITF | +120.0% vs CLSK's +79.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CLSK | -8.5% ROA vs BITF's -16.3%, ROIC 10.3% vs -17.1% |
BITF vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2021
BITF vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLSKLAGGINGBITF
BITFBitfarms Ltd.
0leads
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BITFMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLSK3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CLSK6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLSK4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CLSK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 4.1x BITF's $193M. BITF is the more profitable business, keeping -28.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLSK's -33.2%.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $181M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$458M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -16.8% | +41.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.8% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.0% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -133.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | -2.6% |
CLSK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BITF and CLSK each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BITF's 37.6x.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.62x | 12.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.58x | 6.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.70x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — BITF and CLSK each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLSK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLSK delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-21 for BITF. BITF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLSK's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs BITF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.1% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.9% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.35x | -18.49x |
CLSK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLSK five years ago would be worth $8,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,320 for BITF. Over the past 12 months, BITF leads with a +120.0% total return vs CLSK's +79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 50.7% vs BITF's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | +25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.0% | +79.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.9% | +242.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.8% | -19.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.7% | -83.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +50.7% |
CLSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLSK is the less volatile stock with a 3.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BITF's 3.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLSK currently trades 61.4% from its 52-week high vs BITF's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.69x | 3.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.60 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $7.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32.5M | 19.0M |
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BITF as "Buy" and CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.1% upside for BITF (target: $5) vs 39.4% for CLSK (target: $20). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BITFBitfarms Ltd. | CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.84 | $20.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CLSK leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallCleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BITF vs CLSK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BITF or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 31. 8% for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BITF or CLSK?
Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) delivered a total return of -19. 8%, compared to -56. 8% for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BITF returned +138. 7% versus CLSK's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BITF or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 39β versus Bitfarms Ltd. 's 3. 69β — meaning BITF is approximately 9% more volatile than CLSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 38% for CleanSpark, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BITF or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 31. 8% for Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to 69. 0% for Bitfarms Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BITF or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -28. 0% for Bitfarms Ltd. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -55. 8% for BITF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BITF or CLSK?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BITF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BITF or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bitfarms Ltd.
(BITF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+138. 7% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BITF: +138. 7%, CLSK: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BITF and CLSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (BITF (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BITF: 31.8% · CLSK: 11.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.