Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLK vs STT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BLK vs STT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $166.54B | $42.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.41B | $21.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.10B | $2.98B |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | 58.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.1% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 12.2x |
| Total Debt | $14.22B | $36.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12.76B | $116.10B |
BLK vs STT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 203.1 | +103.1% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 248.1 | +148.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLK vs STT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 246.4% 10Y total return vs STT's 191.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 28.8%, current ratio 16.40x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
STT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- PEG 1.38 vs BLK's 2.49
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLK's 14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 20.2x), PEG 1.38 vs 2.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs BLK's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs STT's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.3% vs BLK's +19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs STT's 0.4% |
BLK vs STT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLK vs STT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT and BLK operate at a comparable scale, with $22.0B and $20.4B in trailing revenue. BLK is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STT's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.4B | $22.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.3B | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.1B | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | -$6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +58.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | -64.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.7% | +23.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, STT trades at a 28% valuation discount to BLK's 25.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STT offers better value at 2.09x vs BLK's 3.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $166.5B | $42.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168.0B | -$36.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.56x | 18.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.21x | 12.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.15x | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.73x | -9.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.16x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STT delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLK scores 6/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$79.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12.8B | $116.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.2B | $36.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.27x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,522 for BLK. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +70.3% total return vs BLK's +19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 32.4% vs BLK's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.7% | +70.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.6% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | +88.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.4% | +191.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
STT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STT is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1219.94 | $156.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $906.57 | $89.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 798K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BLK and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BLK as "Buy" and STT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for BLK (target: $1312) vs 6.1% for STT (target: $160). For income investors, STT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs BLK's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1311.78 | $160.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $20.46 | $3.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +6.8% |
STT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BLK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BLK vs STT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLK or STT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). State Street Corporation (STT) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLK or STT?
On trailing P/E, State Street Corporation (STT) is the cheapest at 18.
4x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, State Street Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 38x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLK or STT?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +88.
8%, compared to +35. 2% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 4% versus STT's +191. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLK or STT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), State Street Corporation (STT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning BLK is approximately 8% more volatile than STT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLK or STT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus 14. 3% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: State Street Corporation grew EPS 47. 1% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLK or STT?
BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus 12. 2% for State Street Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLK leads at 37. 1% versus 15. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STT leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLK or STT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 49x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, State Street Corporation (STT) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for BlackRock, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 22. 2% to $1311. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLK or STT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
State Street Corporation (STT) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 9% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK).
09Is BLK or STT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
19), 2. 3% yield, +191. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STT: +191. 1%, BLK: +246. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLK and STT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.