Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $30M | $2.33B | $36M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $475M | $693K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $43M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 92.7% | 63.4% | 85.0% |
| Operating Margin | -106.9% | 13.2% | -16.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $250K | $180M | $298K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $22M | $11M |
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Digi International … (DGII) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
| Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW) | 100 | 32.3 | -67.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMR vs DGII vs PXLW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.55, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 17.77x
- 5.3% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4%
DGII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.40
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth 77.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 463.4% 10Y total return vs BMR's -41.8%
PXLW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs PXLW's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs BMR's 2.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.0% vs BMR's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs BMR's -32.6%, ROIC 5.7% vs -50.8% |
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGII is the larger business by revenue, generating $475M annually — 685.5x PXLW's $693,000. DGII is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PXLW's -11.9%. On growth, DGII holds the edge at +25.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $475M | $693,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $90M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $43M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $130M | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.7% | +63.4% | +85.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -106.9% | +13.2% | -16.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.7% | +9.1% | -11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.6% | +27.4% | -30.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +25.1% | -3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.5% | +3.6% | +24.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BMR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $2.3B | $36M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $2.5B | $25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.73x | 57.44x | -3.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.89x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.72x | 5.42x | 51.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 3.68x | 4.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DGII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DGII delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-35 for BMR. BMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DGII's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DGII scores 5/9 vs PXLW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.6% | +6.7% | -33.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.6% | +4.8% | -15.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.8% | +5.7% | -106.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.3% | +7.3% | -26.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.28x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $158M | -$11M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $22M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250,000 | $180M | $298,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.50x | 21.93x | -886.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DGII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DGII five years ago would be worth $34,712 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,396 for PXLW. Over the past 12 months, DGII leads with a +121.0% total return vs BMR's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DGII at 25.7% vs PXLW's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.7% | +43.7% | -18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | +121.0% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.7% | +98.5% | -66.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.8% | +247.1% | -86.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.8% | +463.4% | -73.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +25.7% | -30.6% |
Risk & Volatility
DGII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DGII is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BMR's 2.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DGII currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs PXLW's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.43x | 1.35x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $69.81 | $15.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $27.71 | $4.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +88.9% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 69.3 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 268K | 43K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DGII as "Buy", PXLW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 167.4% upside for PXLW (target: $15) vs 10.0% for DGII (target: $68).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.25 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DGII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BMR vs DGII vs PXLW: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMR or DGII or PXLW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beamr Imaging Ltd.
(BMR) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). Digi International Inc. (DGII) offers the better valuation at 57. 4x trailing P/E (26. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Digi International Inc. (DGII) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BMR or DGII or PXLW?
Over the past 5 years, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) delivered a total return of +247. 1%, compared to -86. 0% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGII returned +497. 5% versus PXLW's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BMR or DGII or PXLW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digi International Inc.
(DGII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Beamr Imaging Ltd. 's 2. 43β — meaning BMR is approximately 79% more volatile than DGII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for Digi International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BMR or DGII or PXLW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beamr Imaging Ltd.
(BMR) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digi International Inc. grew EPS 77. 0% year-over-year, compared to -142. 8% for Beamr Imaging Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DGII leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BMR or DGII or PXLW?
Digi International Inc.
(DGII) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 5% net margin versus -1190. 3% for Pixelworks, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DGII leads at 13. 1% versus -1667. 5% for PXLW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMR leads at 92. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BMR or DGII or PXLW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PXLW: 167.
4% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BMR or DGII or PXLW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BMR or DGII or PXLW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+497. 5% 10Y return). Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DGII: +497. 5%, BMR: -40. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BMR and DGII and PXLW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.