Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs LRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Development
MKL vs LRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Real Estate - Development |
| Market Cap | $22.08B | $18M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $36.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.7x | 4.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $11.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $1.30B |
MKL vs LRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs LRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.8%
- 88.3% 10Y total return vs LRE's -77.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 22.5%, current ratio 0.84x
LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 8.6% FFO/revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
- Lower P/E (4.4x vs 15.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% FFO/revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs LRE's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs LRE's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs LRE's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.1% vs MKL's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 4.8% vs 10.7% |
MKL vs LRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKL vs LRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 2.2x MKL's $16.6B. MKL is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LRE's 3.0%. On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $36.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +16.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +19.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +44.9% |
Valuation Metrics
LRE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 58% valuation discount to MKL's 10.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKL's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LRE's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.1B | $18M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.4B | $83M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 4.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.63x | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MKL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. MKL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKL scores 7/9 vs LRE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +26.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 2.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | $10.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $11.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 49.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKL five years ago would be worth $14,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,211 for LRE. Over the past 12 months, LRE leads with a +10.1% total return vs MKL's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKL at 9.3% vs LRE's -39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.2% | -25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.5% | +10.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.5% | -77.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.9% | -77.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | -77.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | -39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKL is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRE's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKL currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $2.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $1.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +44.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.1 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 16K |
Analyst Outlook
MKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs LRE's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $1.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% |
MKL leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LRE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MKL vs LRE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or LRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Markel Corporation (MKL) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or LRE?
On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Markel Corporation at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or LRE?
Over the past 5 years, Markel Corporation (MKL) delivered a total return of +48.
9%, compared to -77. 9% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MKL returned +88. 3% versus LRE's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or LRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Markel Corporation (MKL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
44β versus Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares's 0. 84β — meaning LRE is approximately 92% more volatile than MKL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Markel Corporation (MKL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or LRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares grew EPS 4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or LRE?
Markel Corporation (MKL) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
7% net margin versus 3. 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKL leads at 16. 5% versus 4. 7% for LRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MKL or LRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Markel Corporation (MKL) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE).
08Is MKL or LRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Markel Corporation (MKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
44), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKL: +88. 3%, LRE: -77. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MKL and LRE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKL (Financial Services) and LRE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.