Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRSL vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
BRSL vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.51B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $147M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.45B | $687M |
BRSL vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) | 100 | 150.5 | +50.5% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRSL vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 30.8%
- 31.3% 10Y total return vs PENN's 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, current ratio 0.76x
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -184.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs BRSL's -0.0%
- +6.7% vs BRSL's -2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs BRSL's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.7x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 30.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.7% vs BRSL's -2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 11.7% vs 1.8% |
BRSL vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRSL vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BRSL and PENN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 2.8x BRSL's $2.5B. BRSL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $147M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$456M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BRSL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BRSL's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1269.00x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.65x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.67x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRSL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRSL delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. BRSL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs BRSL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.7% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.66x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRSL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRSL five years ago would be worth $10,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +6.7% total return vs BRSL's -2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRSL at -12.8% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.6% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.8% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.3% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.8% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRSL and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRSL is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs BRSL's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.57 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.02 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRSL as "Buy" and PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.8% upside for BRSL (target: $19) vs 18.5% for PENN (target: $20). BRSL is the only dividend payer here at 30.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +30.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.91 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.5% | +15.8% |
BRSL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
BRSL vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRSL or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). Analysts rate Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRSL or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) delivered a total return of +7.
0%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRSL returned +31. 3% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRSL or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 47% more volatile than BRSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BRSL or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brightstar Lottery grew EPS -100. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PENN leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRSL or PENN?
Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
8% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRSL leads at 35. 1% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRSL leads at 41. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BRSL or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades at 14.
7x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRSL: 45. 8% to $18. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRSL or PENN?
In this comparison, BRSL (30.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BRSL or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
91), 30. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRSL: +31. 3%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRSL and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRSL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRSL pays a dividend while PENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.