Engineering & Construction
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BWMN vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
BWMN vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $532M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $377M | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $541M |
BWMN vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowman Consulting G… (BWMN) | 100 | 224.5 | +124.5% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 310.3 | +210.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWMN vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 329.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.3%
- PEG 0.35 vs PRIM's 1.11
- Lower P/E (17.9x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.11
PRIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.3%
- 415.0% 10Y total return vs BWMN's 121.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 75.9%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs BWMN's 14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs BWMN's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs BWMN's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.3% vs BWMN's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs BWMN's 1.9%, ROIC 13.6% vs 3.6% |
BWMN vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWMN vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 19.9x BWMN's $377M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (PRIM) to 2.8% (BWMN). On growth, PRIM holds the edge at -5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $377M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 54% valuation discount to BWMN's 42.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWMN offers better value at 0.84x vs PRIM's 1.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $532M | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $668M | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.56x | 19.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.88x | 20.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.84x | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.37x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 3.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.91x | 15.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRIM delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for BWMN. BWMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWMN scores 6/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.38x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRIM five years ago would be worth $31,646 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,846 for BWMN. Over the past 12 months, PRIM leads with a +34.3% total return vs BWMN's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 49.9% vs BWMN's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.4% | +34.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +237.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.5% | +216.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +415.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +49.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWMN and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRIM is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWMN's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWMN currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.83 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.00 | $71.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.8% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BWMN as "Buy" and PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.7% upside for BWMN (target: $58) vs 55.3% for PRIM (target: $153). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $153.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +0.2% |
PRIM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BWMN vs PRIM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWMN or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the stronger pick with 19.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWMN or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWMN or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) delivered a total return of +216.
5%, compared to +128. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRIM returned +415. 0% versus BWMN's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWMN or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
60β versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 's 1. 81β — meaning BWMN is approximately 13% more volatile than PRIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWMN or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is pulling ahead at 19.
0% versus 14. 9% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. grew EPS 329. 4% year-over-year, compared to 51. 7% for Primoris Services Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWMN leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWMN or PRIM?
Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
6% net margin versus 2. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRIM leads at 5. 5% versus 3. 9% for BWMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWMN leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWMN or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Primoris Services Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWMN: 86. 7% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWMN or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. BWMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BWMN or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+415.
0% 10Y return). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRIM: +415. 0%, BWMN: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWMN and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BWMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.