Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BWNB vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
BWNB vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $2.38B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $635M | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -26.3% |
| Total Debt | $369M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $12M |
BWNB vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Babcock & Wilcox En… (BWNB) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 176.5 | +76.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWNB vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWNB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 1.16, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.22x
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs BWNB's 29.2%
- 4.3% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.7% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +171.7% vs PESI's +26.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.3% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.1% vs -21.7% |
BWNB vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWNB vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWNB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWNB is the larger business by revenue, generating $635M annually — 10.8x PESI's $59M. BWNB is the more profitable business, keeping -5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, BWNB holds the edge at +142.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $635M | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$86M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.4% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BWNB and PESI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.08x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 80.53x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWNB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs BWNB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $369M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWNB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,924 for BWNB. Over the past 12 months, BWNB leads with a +171.7% total return vs PESI's +26.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWNB at 13.2% vs PESI's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +171.7% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
BWNB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWNB is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWNB currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.40 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.15 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.3 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
PESI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BWNB is the only dividend payer here at 0.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
BWNB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BWNB vs PESI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWNB or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BWNB or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to +29. 2% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus BWNB's +29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BWNB or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
16β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 59% more volatile than BWNB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BWNB or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to 41. 5% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWNB leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BWNB or PESI?
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
1% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWNB leads at 3. 9% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWNB leads at 24. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BWNB or PESI?
In this comparison, BWNB (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PESI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BWNB or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
16), 0. 6% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWNB: +29. 2%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BWNB and PESI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWNB (Technology) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BWNB pays a dividend while PESI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.