Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BYND vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
BYND vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $482M | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $265M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $244M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 3.5% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | -82.4% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $508M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $208M | $98M |
BYND vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYND vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 92.2% margin vs SMPL's 6.3%
- -58.7% vs SMPL's -65.1%
- 39.3% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs 8.1%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.38
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs BYND's -98.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs SMPL's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -58.7% vs SMPL's -65.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs 8.1% |
BYND vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BYND vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 5.5x BYND's $265M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMPL's 6.3%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $265M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$193M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $244M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$134M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.4% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +92.2% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.6% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.3% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BYND and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $482M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $782M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.57x | 12.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +39.3% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.3% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $300M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $208M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $508M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -29.55x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,630 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $87 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, BYND leads with a -58.7% total return vs SMPL's -65.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMPL at -31.1% vs BYND's -56.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | -35.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.7% | -65.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | -67.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.9% | -31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SMPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMPL currently trades 34.1% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.69 | $36.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +34.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58.6M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BYND as "Sell" and SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4183.7% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 59.7% for SMPL (target: $20).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.55 | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
SMPL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
BYND vs SMPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYND or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BYND or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -63.
7%, compared to -99. 1% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +3. 7% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BYND or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 342% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BYND or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beyond Meat, Inc. grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BYND or SMPL?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus 7. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BYND or SMPL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4183.
7% to $44. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — BYND or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BYND or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +3. 7%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BYND and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.