Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $190M | $207M | $272M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $90M | $120M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $14M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | 54.7% | 70.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 7.0% | 27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 11.8x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $52M | $115M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $119M | $132M |
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB Financial Servic… (CBFV) | 100 | 171.9 | +71.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBFV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.41, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.02x
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +52.1% vs CBFV's +34.6%
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- PEG 0.74 vs CZWI's 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs CBFV's +34.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5% |
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories
CBFV leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $120M annually — 1.7x CBFV's $69M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $90M | $120M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $9M | $35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $14M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $11M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.5% | +54.7% | +70.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +7.0% | +27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +16.0% | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +12.4% | +13.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.5% | +63.0% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 73% valuation discount to CBFV's 40.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $207M | $272M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193M | $140M | $255M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.78x | 14.70x | 11.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | 11.79x | 9.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.90x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.19x | 15.69x | 7.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 2.29x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.11x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.09x | 19.90x | 17.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs CBFV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +7.8% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +2.0% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +0.6% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.28x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$67M | -$17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $119M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $52M | $115M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 0.16x | 0.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,900 for CZWI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs CBFV's +34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs CBFV's 26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +24.3% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | +52.1% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.8% | +153.7% | +192.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.7% | +69.0% | +141.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +149.0% | +361.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +36.4% | +43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CBFV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBFV currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.50x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $22.62 | $42.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.11 | $12.83 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +94.9% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 51.2 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 41K | 13K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBFV and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy". For income investors, CBFV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.37 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +3.0% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CBFV leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CBFV vs CZWI vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBFV or CZWI or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus CB Financial Services, Inc. at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +69. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus CBFV's +114. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CB Financial Services, Inc.
(CBFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus First United Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning FUNC is approximately 61% more volatile than CBFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
6% net margin versus 7. 1% for CB Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBFV or CZWI or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CB Financial Services, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or CZWI or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CBFV or CZWI or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CB Financial Services, Inc.
(CBFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBFV: +114. 0%, FUNC: +361. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBFV and CZWI and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.