Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCB vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CCB vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $661M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $657M |
CCB vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Financial C… (CCB) | 100 | 589.4 | +489.4% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCB vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth -6.5%
- 356.5% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 11.8%, current ratio 728.91x
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.00x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CCB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | PEG 0.72 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CCB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs CCB's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs CCB's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CCB's 0.4% |
CCB vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCB vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.1x CCB's $661M. WAFD is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCB's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $661M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $246M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WAFD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, WAFD trades at a 45% valuation discount to CCB's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCB offers better value at 1.25x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.63x | 13.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.06x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.25x | 4.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.01x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.36x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.63x | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCB delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. CCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs CCB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCB five years ago would be worth $25,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,248 for WAFD. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs CCB's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCB at 29.7% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.9% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.3% | +28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.1% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.3% | +22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +356.5% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.7% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCB's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs CCB's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.05 | $36.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.72 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.4% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 661K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCB as "Buy" and WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.0% upside for CCB (target: $133) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). WAFD is the only dividend payer here at 2.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.50 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +3.7% |
WAFD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CCB leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
CCB vs WAFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCB or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) is the stronger pick with 14.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCB or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Coastal Financial Corporation at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coastal Financial Corporation wins at 0. 72x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCB or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) delivered a total return of +153.
3%, compared to +22. 5% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCB returned +356. 5% versus WAFD's +84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCB or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Coastal Financial Corporation's 1. 62β — meaning CCB is approximately 99% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCB or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) is pulling ahead at 14.
7% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WaFd, Inc. grew EPS 5. 2% year-over-year, compared to -6. 5% for Coastal Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCB or WAFD?
WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 7. 1% for Coastal Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAFD leads at 20. 5% versus 9. 3% for CCB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCB leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCB or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Coastal Financial Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCB: 77. 0% to $132. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCB or WAFD?
In this comparison, WAFD (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CCB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCB or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, CCB: +356. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCB and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. WAFD pays a dividend while CCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.