CE vs AVNT

For growth investors, Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the stronger pick with 0.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). Avient Corporation (AVNT) offers the better valuation at 42. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avient Corporation (AVNT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Celanese Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.

1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Avient Corporation (AVNT) delivered a total return of -19.

6%, compared to -57. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVNT returned +28. 8% versus CE's +16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Celanese Corporation (CE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

11β versus Avient Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning AVNT is approximately 8% more volatile than CE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avient Corporation (AVNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 3% for Celanese Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avient Corporation (AVNT) is pulling ahead at 0.

6% versus -7. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Celanese Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -51. 6% for Avient Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CE leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

5% net margin versus -12. 2% for Celanese Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CE leads at 8. 0% versus 6. 2% for AVNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVNT leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Celanese Corporation (CE) trades at 11.

1x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Avient Corporation — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 27. 9% to $48. 40.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Avient Corporation (AVNT) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

19), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVNT: +28. 8%, CE: +16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AVNT pays a dividend while CE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.