CEPO
Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares
Shell Companies
Market Cap$217M
5Y Perf.+5.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CEPO vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-51.6%
CEPO vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CEPO | PSFE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $217M | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $486K | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $1.35B |
CEPO vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CEPO
PSFE
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantor Equity Partn… (CEPO) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CEPO vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CEPO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Paysafe Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CEPO
Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick
CEPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.08
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 0.26x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Growth Play
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -9.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- Better valuation composite
- -3.8% ROA vs CEPO's -5.7%, ROIC 3.6% vs -0.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CEPO | 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% |
| Value | PSFE | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | CEPO | 3.6% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CEPO | Beta 0.08 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CEPO | -9.3% vs PSFE's -37.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PSFE | -3.8% ROA vs CEPO's -5.7%, ROIC 3.6% vs -0.8% |
CEPO vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CEPO vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCEPOLAGGINGPSFE
PSFEPaysafe Limited
2leads
CEPOCantor Equity Partner…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PSFEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PSFE1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSFE2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CEPO5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CEPO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CEPO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and CEPO operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1 | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -183.3% |
PSFE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $217M | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $217M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.65x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4121.21x | 2.17x |
PSFE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CEPO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CEPO delivers a -8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. CEPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEPO scores 6/9 vs PSFE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460,504 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,000 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $485,504 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
CEPO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CEPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CEPO five years ago would be worth $10,517 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, CEPO leads with a -9.3% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CEPO at 1.7% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.3% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | -13.3% |
CEPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CEPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CEPO is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CEPO currently trades 64.1% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.27 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 361K |
CEPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CEPOCantor Equity Par… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CEPO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PSFE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallCantor Equity Partners I, I… (CEPO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CEPO vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CEPO or PSFE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CEPO or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) delivered a total return of +5. 2%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CEPO returned +5. 2% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CEPO or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 2934% more volatile than CEPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — CEPO or PSFE?
Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for CEPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CEPO or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CEPO or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cantor Equity Partners I, Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (CEPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CEPO: +5. 2%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CEPO and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (CEPO (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.