Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CGAU vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
CGAU vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $3.54B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.54B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $636M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $528M | $242M |
CGAU vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) | 100 | 175.2 | +75.2% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGAU vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGAU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.39x
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.39x
HL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs CGAU's 240.7%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs CGAU's 9.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs CGAU's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.2% margin vs HL's 35.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs HL's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs CGAU's +146.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs HL's 16.3%, ROIC 13.6% vs 15.3% |
CGAU vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CGAU vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CGAU and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL and CGAU operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $1.5B in trailing revenue. CGAU is the more profitable business, keeping 41.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HL's 35.6%. On growth, CGAU holds the edge at +61.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $738M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $636M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.8% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CGAU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, CGAU trades at a 83% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CGAU's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.14x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.08x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.31x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.67x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.77x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.47x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGAU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGAU delivers a 32.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $23 for HL. CGAU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs CGAU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.6% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.1% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$498M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $528M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.90x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGAU five years ago would be worth $27,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,033 for HL. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs CGAU's +146.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs CGAU's 38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.9% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +146.3% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.3% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.7% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CGAU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CGAU is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGAU currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.17 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.35 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CGAU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CGAU as "Buy" and HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs 7.0% for CGAU (target: $19). CGAU is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +0.0% |
CGAU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CGAU vs HL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGAU or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU). Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGAU or HL?
On trailing P/E, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Centerra Gold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGAU or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) delivered a total return of +171. 3%, compared to +150. 3% for Hecla Mining Company (HL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus CGAU's +240. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGAU or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Hecla Mining Company's 1. 26β — meaning HL is approximately 89% more volatile than CGAU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGAU or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 9. 5% for Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 725. 7% for Centerra Gold Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGAU or HL?
Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the more profitable company, earning 44. 7% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 44. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 17. 9% for CGAU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGAU or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGAU or HL?
In this comparison, CGAU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CGAU or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Centerra Gold Inc.
(CGAU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 1. 1% yield, +240. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGAU: +240. 7%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGAU and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CGAU is a small-cap deep-value stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CGAU pays a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.