CGTL vs CLPS vs CAN

For growth investors, Canaan Inc.

(CAN) is the stronger pick with 96. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -67.

7%, compared to -92. 0% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CGTL returned -68. 8% versus CAN's -89. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately 1524% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canaan Inc.

(CAN) is pulling ahead at 96. 7% versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 61. 5% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CGTL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

0% net margin versus -39. 7% for Canaan Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CGTL leads at 14. 6% versus -21. 2% for CAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPS leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CGTL, CAN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 3% yield). Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 1%, CAN: -89. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CGTL (Consumer Cyclical) and CLPS (Technology) and CAN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CGTL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while CGTL, CAN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.