Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMG vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CHMG vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $322M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $119M |
CHMG vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.3 | +186.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMG vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -6.5%, EPS growth -36.9%
- 191.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 156.6%
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -6.5% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs CHMG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.4% vs CZWI's +42.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
CHMG vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHMG vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 1.6x CZWI's $90M. CZWI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.8% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 33% valuation discount to CHMG's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZWI's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 15.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.42x | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.38x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.28x | 15.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 159.23x | 19.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,974 for CHMG. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +49.4% total return vs CZWI's +42.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.4% vs CHMG's 26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.7% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.4% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.9% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +73.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.5% | +156.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.83 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHMG as "Hold" and CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, CHMG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.96% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% |
CZWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHMG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CHMG vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMG or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger pick with -6.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMG or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 4%, compared to +69. 7% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +191. 5% versus CZWI's +156. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMG or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 73β — meaning CHMG is approximately 60% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMG or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is pulling ahead at -6.
5% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMG or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHMG leads at 14. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHMG leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMG or CZWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.
4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CHMG or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 6%, CHMG: +191. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMG and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.