CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHNR vs GURE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
CHNR vs GURE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHNR | GURE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $42M | $4M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $14M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | — | -82.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -116.6% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $10M |
CHNR vs GURE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHNR
GURE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHNR vs GURE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Gulf Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs GURE's -95.0%
- 0.0% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
- -2.3% vs GURE's -40.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.
The Income Pick
GURE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52
- Rev growth -74.5%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -48.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GURE | -74.5% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs GURE's -195.8% |
| Stability / Safety | GURE | Beta 0.52 vs CHNR's 1.12 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHNR | -2.3% vs GURE's -40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHNR | -5.3% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC -0.0% vs -11.2% |
CHNR vs GURE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2023
CHNR vs GURE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHNRLAGGINGGURE
GUREGulf Resources, Inc.
2leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GUREMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GURE1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHNR7/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHNR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GURE1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GURE and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $14M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $14M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$498,990 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -82.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -116.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -195.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | +98.1% |
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHNR and GURE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $4M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $3M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.68x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.21x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — CHNR and GURE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR delivers a -15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-19 for GURE.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | -19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -263.29x | -268.95x |
CHNR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $721 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $537 for GURE. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs GURE's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.2% vs GURE's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -87.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -94.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -95.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.2% | -50.2% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHNR and GURE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHNR's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs GURE's 30.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $11.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.16 | $2.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +30.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 893K | 60K |
Evenly matched — CHNR and GURE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | GUREGulf Resources, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GURE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CHNR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallChina Natural Resources, In… (CHNR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHNR vs GURE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or GURE?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 8%, compared to -94. 6% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus GURE's -95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — CHNR or GURE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus China Natural Resources, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CHNR is approximately 115% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CHNR or GURE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CHNR or GURE?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHNR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or GURE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CHNR or GURE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GURE: -95. 0%, CHNR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CHNR and GURE?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and GURE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.