Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHPT vs AMPY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
CHPT vs AMPY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $138M | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $411M | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-220M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 93.2% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $272M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $61M |
CHPT vs AMPY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) | 100 | 503.6 | +403.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHPT vs AMPY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.61
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth 26.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.2%
- -1.4% revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6%
AMPY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.2% 10Y total return vs CHPT's -96.7%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.19, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.25x
- Beta -0.19, current ratio 2.25x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs CHPT's -53.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.6% vs 12.7%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +108.3% vs CHPT's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs CHPT's -25.8%, ROIC 12.3% vs -83.8% |
CHPT vs AMPY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHPT vs AMPY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMPY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $411M annually — 1.6x AMPY's $263M. AMPY is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHPT's -53.5%. On growth, CHPT holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $411M | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$180M | $109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$220M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | -$13.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +93.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.5% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | -51.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | -18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.8% | +8394.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CHPT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $167M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.68x | 5.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.99x | 0.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. AMPY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPY scores 7/9 vs CHPT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.8% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -83.8% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.75x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $130M | -$58M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $61M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $272M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.58x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMPY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMPY five years ago would be worth $18,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $141 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, AMPY leads with a +108.3% total return vs CHPT's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMPY at -7.3% vs CHPT's -67.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.5% | +108.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -20.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +89.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | +922.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.3% | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMPY is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHPT's 2.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMPY currently trades 81.6% from its 52-week high vs CHPT's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.61x | -0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.78 | $6.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.45 | $2.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.8% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 473K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHPT as "Hold" and AMPY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.0% upside for AMPY (target: $10) vs 17.9% for CHPT (target: $8).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $10.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMPY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CHPT vs AMPY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHPT or AMPY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
(CHPT) is the stronger pick with -1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CHPT or AMPY?
Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) delivered a total return of +89. 1%, compared to -98. 6% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +922. 7% versus CHPT's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CHPT or AMPY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning CHPT is approximately -1487% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CHPT or AMPY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
(CHPT) is pulling ahead at -1. 4% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHPT leads at -4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CHPT or AMPY?
Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -53. 5% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPY leads at 29. 2% versus -51. 1% for CHPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CHPT or AMPY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMPY: 85.
0% to $10. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — CHPT or AMPY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CHPT or AMPY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +922. 7% 10Y return). ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +922. 7%, CHPT: -96. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CHPT and AMPY?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and AMPY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.