Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPY vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
AMPY vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $255M | $222M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 93.2% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.2x | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $20M |
AMPY vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) | 100 | 569.1 | +469.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPY vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.19
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 87.5%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.19, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.25x
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6%
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs AMPY's 16.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.6% vs 132.7%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +140.8% vs TPVG's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs TPVG's 6.2%, ROIC 12.3% vs 7.2% |
AMPY vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPY vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMPY is the larger business by revenue, generating $263M annually — 2.7x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMPY's 16.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $109M | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13.5B | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.2% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8394.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMPY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 26% valuation discount to AMPY's 6.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMPY's 1.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPVG's 8.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $222M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $197M | $671M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.08x | 4.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.19x | 5.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.80x | 8.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $11 for AMPY. AMPY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPY scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.3% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$58M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMPY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMPY five years ago would be worth $22,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,700 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, AMPY leads with a +140.8% total return vs TPVG's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.5% vs AMPY's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.2% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +140.8% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | -4.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.4% | -23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1044.6% | +87.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMPY is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMPY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 72.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.19x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.79 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.60 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +72.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 491K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMPY as "Buy" and TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.7% upside for AMPY (target: $10) vs 63.3% for TPVG (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.25 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMPY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
AMPY vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPY or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMPY or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Amplify Energy Corp. at 6. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMPY or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) delivered a total return of +120. 4%, compared to -23. 0% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +1045% versus TPVG's +87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMPY or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately -542% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMPY or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMPY or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 16. 7% for Amplify Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 29. 2% for AMPY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMPY or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMPY: 63. 7% to $10. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMPY or TPVG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMPY or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +1045% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +1045%, TPVG: +87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMPY and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMPY (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.