Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLBK vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CLBK vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $185M |
CLBK vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Financial,… (CLBK) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLBK vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLBK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +27.2% vs NBTB's +9.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs CLBK's 25.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CLBK's 7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs CLBK's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CLBK vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLBK vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 1.9x CLBK's $453M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLBK's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -175.36x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.09x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.09x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for CLBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLBK's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CLBK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $791M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.06x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,587 for CLBK. Over the past 12 months, CLBK leads with a +27.2% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.6% vs CLBK's 7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.1% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.5% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLBK's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.74 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.66 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 255K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBK as "Hold" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -11.9% for CLBK (target: $17). NBTB is the only dividend payer here at 3.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
CLBK vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBK or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 3% for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBK or NBTB?
On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBK or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to +5. 9% for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus CLBK's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBK or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Columbia Financial, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning CLBK is approximately 2% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 100% for Columbia Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLBK or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 7. 3% for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -131. 4% for Columbia Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLBK or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -2. 6% for Columbia Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -3. 5% for CLBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLBK or NBTB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Columbia Financial, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 1. 8% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLBK or NBTB?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CLBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLBK or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, CLBK: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLBK and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NBTB pays a dividend while CLBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.