Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CLX vs ENR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CLX
The Clorox Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.88B
5Y Perf.-56.4%
ENR
Energizer Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.-56.8%

CLX vs ENR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CLX logoCLX
ENR logoENR
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$10.88B$1.30B
Revenue (TTM)$6.76B$2.98B
Net Income (TTM)$756M$195M
Gross Margin43.8%40.9%
Operating Margin15.9%15.8%
Forward P/E15.3x5.7x
Total Debt$2.88B$3.53B
Cash & Equiv.$167M$236M

CLX vs ENRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CLX
ENR
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Clorox Company (CLX)10043.6-56.4%
Energizer Holdings,… (ENR)10043.2-56.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CLX vs ENR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Energizer Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CLX
The Clorox Company
The Income Pick

CLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 5.4%
  • 2.1% 10Y total return vs ENR's -28.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 0.84x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ENR
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

ENR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.1%
  • Beta 1.24, yield 6.4%, current ratio 2.11x
  • 2.3% revenue growth vs CLX's 0.2%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthENR logoENR2.3% revenue growth vs CLX's 0.2%
ValueENR logoENRLower P/E (5.7x vs 15.3x)
Quality / MarginsCLX logoCLX11.2% margin vs ENR's 6.5%
Stability / SafetyCLX logoCLXBeta 0.42 vs ENR's 1.24, lower leverage
DividendsCLX logoCLX5.4% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs ENR's 6.4%
Momentum (1Y)ENR logoENR-15.5% vs CLX's -29.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CLX logoCLX13.1% ROA vs ENR's 4.4%, ROIC 27.7% vs 11.8%

CLX vs ENR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CLXThe Clorox Company
FY 2025
Health and Wellness
38.2%$2.7B
Household
28.3%$2.0B
Lifestyle
18.4%$1.3B
International
15.1%$1.1B
ENREnergizer Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Alkaline Batteries
76.1%$2.2B
Auto Care
21.0%$620M
Other Batteries and Lighting Products
2.9%$85M

CLX vs ENR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLXLAGGINGENR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 2.3x ENR's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (CLX) to 6.5% (ENR). On growth, CLX holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.8B$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$566M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$756M$195M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$380M$159M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+43.8%+40.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.9%+15.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%+6.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.6%+5.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.1%-3.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%-61.5%
CLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ENR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, ENR trades at a 59% valuation discount to CLX's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENR's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLX's 9.7x.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
Market CapShares × price$10.9B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.6B$4.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.81x5.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.34x5.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.73x7.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.53x0.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share23.21x8.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.30x20.58x
ENR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLX delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $117 for ENR. CLX carries lower financial leverage with a 5.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENR's 20.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLX scores 7/9 vs ENR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.0%+116.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.1%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+27.7%+11.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+30.2%+14.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.98x20.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.7B$3.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$167M$236M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.9B$3.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.38x2.10x
CLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ENR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLX five years ago would be worth $6,176 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,057 for ENR. Over the past 12 months, ENR leads with a -15.5% total return vs CLX's -29.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENR at -13.4% vs CLX's -14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.3%-3.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-29.7%-15.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.4%-35.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-38.2%-49.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.1%-28.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.5%-13.4%
ENR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENR's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$138.94$30.29
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$84.70$16.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.8%+62.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10025.241.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.6M1.1M
CLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CLX and ENR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CLX as "Hold" and ENR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for ENR (target: $23) vs 17.2% for CLX (target: $106). For income investors, ENR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.38% vs CLX's 5.38%.

MetricCLX logoCLXThe Clorox CompanyENR logoENREnergizer Holding…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$105.50$23.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts2824
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.4%+6.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises262
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.84$1.21
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.1%+6.9%
Evenly matched — CLX and ENR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ENR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Clorox Company (CLX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CLX vs ENR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CLX or ENR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Energizer Holdings, Inc.

(ENR) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for The Clorox Company (CLX). Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Clorox Company (CLX) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CLX or ENR?

On trailing P/E, Energizer Holdings, Inc.

(ENR) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus The Clorox Company at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, Energizer Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CLX or ENR?

Over the past 5 years, The Clorox Company (CLX) delivered a total return of -38.

2%, compared to -49. 4% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLX returned +2. 1% versus ENR's -28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CLX or ENR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Clorox Company (CLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

42β versus Energizer Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning ENR is approximately 195% more volatile than CLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Clorox Company (CLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 21% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CLX or ENR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energizer Holdings, Inc.

(ENR) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus 0. 2% for The Clorox Company (CLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energizer Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 538. 5% year-over-year, compared to 189. 8% for The Clorox Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLX leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CLX or ENR?

The Clorox Company (CLX) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

4% net margin versus 8. 1% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENR leads at 17. 8% versus 16. 6% for CLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLX leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CLX or ENR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Energizer Holdings, Inc.

(ENR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for The Clorox Company — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENR: 22. 3% to $23. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CLX or ENR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 5. 4% for The Clorox Company (CLX).

09

Is CLX or ENR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Clorox Company (CLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

42), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLX: +2. 1%, ENR: -28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CLX and ENR?

These companies operate in different sectors (CLX (Consumer Defensive) and ENR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CLX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CLX and ENR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CLX: 0.1% · ENR: -3.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(CLX: 11.2% · ENR: 6.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CLX: 13.8x · ENR: 5.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.