Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNC vs ELV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
CNC vs ELV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $27.31B | $81.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198.10B | $200.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6.44B | $5.24B |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $18.78B | $33.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.89B | $9.49B |
CNC vs ELV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centene Corporation (CNC) | 100 | 82.9 | -17.1% |
| Elevance Health Inc. (ELV) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNC vs ELV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
- Rev growth 19.4%, EPS growth -315.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 1.68x
ELV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 206.0% 10Y total return vs CNC's 85.1%
- Combined ratio 1.0 vs CNC's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.4% revenue growth vs ELV's 12.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 1.0 vs CNC's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs ELV's 0.46 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.3% vs ELV's -7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs CNC's -7.9%, ROIC 9.1% vs -21.6% |
CNC vs ELV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNC vs ELV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELV and CNC operate at a comparable scale, with $200.4B and $198.1B in trailing revenue. ELV is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNC's -3.3%. On growth, CNC holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198.1B | $200.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5.9B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6.4B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.3B | $6.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | -16.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.3B | $81.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.2B | $105.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.06x | 14.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.29x | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.32x | 25.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELV leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELV delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-29 for CNC. ELV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNC's 0.94x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.9% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.6% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.6% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $889M | $23.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.9B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18.8B | $33.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.03x | 5.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELV five years ago would be worth $10,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,485 for CNC. Over the past 12 months, CNC leads with a -7.3% total return vs ELV's -7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELV at -5.4% vs CNC's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.4% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | -7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | -15.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +4.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.1% | +206.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNC and ELV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELV's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.15 | $424.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.08 | $273.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.9 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ELV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNC as "Buy" and ELV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.0% upside for ELV (target: $382) vs -7.8% for CNC (target: $51). ELV is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $382.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +3.2% |
ELV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CNC vs ELV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNC or ELV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Centene Corporation (CNC) is the stronger pick with 19.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for Elevance Health Inc. (ELV). Elevance Health Inc. (ELV) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centene Corporation (CNC) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNC or ELV?
On forward P/E, Elevance Health Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNC or ELV?
Over the past 5 years, Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) delivered a total return of +4. 0%, compared to -15. 1% for Centene Corporation (CNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELV returned +202. 1% versus CNC's +81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNC or ELV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centene Corporation (CNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Elevance Health Inc. 's 0. 46β — meaning ELV is approximately 18% more volatile than CNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Elevance Health Inc. (ELV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 94% for Centene Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNC or ELV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Centene Corporation (CNC) is pulling ahead at 19.
4% versus 12. 6% for Elevance Health Inc. (ELV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Elevance Health Inc. grew EPS -2. 2% year-over-year, compared to -315. 8% for Centene Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNC leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNC or ELV?
Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -3. 4% for Centene Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELV leads at 4. 1% versus -3. 9% for CNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELV leads at 25. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNC or ELV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Centene Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELV: 2. 0% to $382. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNC or ELV?
In this comparison, ELV (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CNC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNC or ELV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +202. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELV: +202. 1%, CNC: +81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNC and ELV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ELV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ELV pays a dividend while CNC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.