Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $138M | $362.56B | $74.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $61.16B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $4.23B | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | 95.6% | 70.2% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | -223.4% | 26.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.4x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $178K | $69.07B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $5.23B | $3.12B |
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connect Biopharma H… (CNTB) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 152.3 | +52.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 72.2% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- +213.1% vs ABBV's +13.1%
ABBV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 306.7% 10Y total return vs REGN's 96.0%
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 29.6% margin vs CNTB's -220.1%
- 11.1% ROA vs CNTB's -69.4%, ROIC 8.9% vs -338.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.2% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs CNTB's -220.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs REGN's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +213.1% vs ABBV's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs CNTB's -69.4%, ROIC 8.9% vs -338.2% |
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNTB leads 1 • REGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 2345.4x CNTB's $26M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTB's -2.2%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $61.2B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$57M | $24.5B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | $4.2B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $18.7B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.6% | +70.2% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +26.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.9% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +30.6% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.8% | +10.0% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +57.4% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNTB and ABBV and REGN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 86.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 18.1x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $362.6B | $74.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $60M | $426.4B | $74.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | 86.49x | 17.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.44x | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.10x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.29x | 5.93x | 5.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | — | 2.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.35x | 18.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-80 for CNTB. CNTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REGN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs REGN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.4% | +62.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.4% | +3.1% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | +23.9% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.2% | +21.5% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$78M | $63.8B | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $5.2B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $178,000 | $69.1B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5993.94x | 3.28x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,540 for CNTB. Over the past 12 months, CNTB leads with a +213.1% total return vs ABBV's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNTB at 28.1% vs REGN's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -9.1% | -7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +213.1% | +13.1% | +29.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +52.0% | -3.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | +102.8% | +45.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.6% | +306.7% | +96.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.1% | +15.0% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNTB and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNTB is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REGN's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs CNTB's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 0.34x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.82 | $244.81 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $176.57 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +83.7% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 48.2 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 271K | 5.9M | 634K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNTB as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 262.9% upside for CNTB (target: $9) vs 20.1% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs REGN's 0.47%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $256.64 | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 41 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +5.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNTB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CNTB vs ABBV vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNTB or ABBV or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus AbbVie Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +102. 8%, compared to -84. 6% for Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +306. 7% versus CNTB's -86. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning REGN is approximately -682% more volatile than CNTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited grew EPS 74. 1% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -60. 0% for Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -86. 2% for CNTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNTB or ABBV or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNTB: 262. 9% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNTB or ABBV or REGN?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CNTB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNTB or ABBV or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +306. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +306. 7%, REGN: +96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNTB and ABBV and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABBV pays a dividend while CNTB, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.