Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNTB vs ARQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CNTB vs ARQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $138M | $3.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $416M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 95.6% | 90.9% |
| Operating Margin | -223.4% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 90.8x |
| Total Debt | $178K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $43M |
CNTB vs ARQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connect Biopharma H… (CNTB) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNTB vs ARQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNTB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.14, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- Beta -0.14, current ratio 11.46x
- Lower D/E ratio (0.2% vs 3.3%)
ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs CNTB's -86.6%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs CNTB's 72.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs CNTB's 72.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs CNTB's -220.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.2% vs 3.3%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +213.1% vs ARQT's +68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs CNTB's -69.4%, ROIC -5.2% vs -338.2% |
CNTB vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNTB vs ARQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $416M annually — 15.9x CNTB's $26M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.6% (ARQT) to -2.2% (CNTB). On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $416M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$57M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.6% | +90.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.8% | +60.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNTB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $60M | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | -185.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 90.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.29x | 8.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 16.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-80 for CNTB. CNTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARQT's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNTB scores 5/9 vs ARQT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.4% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.2% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$78M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $178,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5993.94x | 4.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARQT five years ago would be worth $7,410 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,540 for CNTB. Over the past 12 months, CNTB leads with a +213.1% total return vs ARQT's +68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNTB at 28.1% vs ARQT's 19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +213.1% | +68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +69.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | -25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.6% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.1% | +19.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNTB and ARQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNTB is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARQT currently trades 76.1% from its 52-week high vs CNTB's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.82 | $31.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $12.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +76.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 271K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNTB as "Buy" and ARQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 262.9% upside for CNTB (target: $9) vs 46.9% for ARQT (target: $36).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNTB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CNTB vs ARQT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNTB or ARQT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CNTB or ARQT?
Over the past 5 years, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) delivered a total return of -25. 9%, compared to -84. 6% for Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARQT returned +10. 9% versus CNTB's -86. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CNTB or ARQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ARQT is approximately -1169% more volatile than CNTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CNTB or ARQT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to 74. 1% for Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CNTB or ARQT?
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -60. 0% for Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARQT leads at -3. 3% versus -86. 2% for CNTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CNTB or ARQT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNTB: 262.
9% to $9. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CNTB or ARQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CNTB or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited (CNTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNTB: -86. 6%, ARQT: +10. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CNTB and ARQT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.