Medical - Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CON vs AMSF vs OHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
CON vs AMSF vs OHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Equipment & Services | Insurance - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $3.03B | $569M | $13.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.23B | $325M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $178M | $46M | $632M |
| Gross Margin | 28.7% | 47.6% | 85.5% |
| Operating Margin | 89.9% | 17.8% | 64.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 14.4x | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.10B | $491K | $4.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $62M | $27M |
CON vs AMSF vs OHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentra Group Hol… (CON) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
| Omega Healthcare In… (OHI) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CON vs AMSF vs OHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CON is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.1% ROA vs AMSF's 5.6%, ROIC 69.4% vs 21.9%
AMSF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.23, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
OHI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- 110.0% 10Y total return vs AMSF's 31.8%
- 14.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.0% margin vs CON's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs CON's 0.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.4% yield, vs CON's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs AMSF's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs AMSF's 5.6%, ROIC 69.4% vs 21.9% |
CON vs AMSF vs OHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CON vs AMSF vs OHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CON is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 6.9x AMSF's $325M. OHI is the more profitable business, keeping 51.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CON's 8.0%. On growth, OHI holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $325M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $58M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $178M | $46M | $632M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $293M | $8M | $912M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +47.6% | +85.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | +17.8% | +64.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +14.3% | +51.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +2.5% | +73.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.7% | +10.3% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.8% | -8.5% | +42.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CON and AMSF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 48% valuation discount to OHI's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CON's 2.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OHI's 16.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $569M | $13.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $508M | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.16x | 12.27x | 23.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.18x | 14.42x | 23.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.34x | 8.53x | 16.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 1.80x | 11.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.20x | 2.30x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.40x | 63.83x | 15.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CON leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CON delivers a 43.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMSF. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CON's 5.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs CON's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +43.7% | +9.7% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +5.6% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +69.4% | +21.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +84.9% | +16.8% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.00x | 0.00x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | -$61M | $4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $62M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $491,000 | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.59x | — | 3.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OHI five years ago would be worth $16,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,110 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, OHI leads with a +36.9% total return vs AMSF's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OHI at 23.0% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | -18.3% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | -29.2% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.7% | -24.8% | +86.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.7% | -18.9% | +63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.7% | +31.8% | +110.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | -9.1% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CON and OHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CON's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CON currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.23x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.68 | $48.54 | $49.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.55 | $29.42 | $35.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +62.4% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 34.2 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 654K | 212K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
AMSF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CON as "Buy", AMSF as "Buy", OHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs 6.5% for OHI (target: $49). For income investors, AMSF offers the higher dividend yield at 8.41% vs CON's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $44.50 | $49.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +8.4% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $2.55 | $2.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
OHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CON leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CON vs AMSF vs OHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CON or AMSF or OHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CON or AMSF or OHI?
On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CON or AMSF or OHI?
Over the past 5 years, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) delivered a total return of +63. 1%, compared to -18. 9% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OHI returned +110. 0% versus CON's +6. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CON or AMSF or OHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. 's 0. 69β — meaning CON is approximately -639% more volatile than OHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CON or AMSF or OHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OHI leads at 10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CON or AMSF or OHI?
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus 8. 0% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CON leads at 96. 5% versus 18. 6% for AMSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CON or AMSF or OHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 46. 9% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CON or AMSF or OHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the highest yield at 8. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON).
09Is CON or AMSF or OHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13), 5. 4% yield, +110. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OHI: +110. 0%, CON: +6. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CON and AMSF and OHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CON (Healthcare) and AMSF (Financial Services) and OHI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; OHI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.