Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Trucking
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $775K | $2.83B | $2.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $4.17B | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $202M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 24.1% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | -63.3% | 7.0% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $1.24B | $669M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $223M | $102M |
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREV) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| LCI Industries (LCII) | 100 | 122.8 | +22.8% |
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREV vs LCII vs ARCB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 86.8% revenue growth vs ARCB's -4.0%
LCII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 90.8%, current ratio 2.85x
- Beta 0.99, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.85x
ARCB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.3% 10Y total return vs LCII's 111.5%
- +107.5% vs CREV's -85.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs ARCB's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs CREV's -79.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs CREV's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ARCB's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.5% vs CREV's -85.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs CREV's -25.2%, ROIC 9.1% vs -27.1% |
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LCII leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARCB leads 1 • CREV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCII is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 72.3x CREV's $58M. LCII is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREV's -79.6%. On growth, CREV holds the edge at +107.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $4.2B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $385M | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $202M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $245M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +24.1% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.3% | +7.0% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | +4.8% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -107.6% | +5.9% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.9% | +4.3% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.9% | +30.4% | -138.5% |
Valuation Metrics
LCII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, LCII trades at a 67% valuation discount to ARCB's 46.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LCII's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARCB's 12.6x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $775,174 | $2.8B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $3.8B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 15.38x | 46.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.38x | 23.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.57x | 12.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.69x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.13x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.16x | 23.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LCII leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LCII delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for ARCB. ARCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCII's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LCII scores 8/9 vs CREV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +14.7% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.2% | +6.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +9.1% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +10.8% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.91x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $1.0B | $567M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $223M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $1.2B | $669M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | 5.49x | 6.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCB five years ago would be worth $13,711 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CREV. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +107.5% total return vs CREV's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCB at 12.0% vs CREV's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.8% | -5.4% | +58.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.9% | +45.6% | +107.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +11.2% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -6.1% | +37.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +111.5% | +627.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.1% | +3.6% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LCII and ARCB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LCII is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CREV's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCB currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs CREV's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 0.99x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.20 | $159.66 | $135.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $82.29 | $58.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.4% | +72.9% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 45.6 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 352K | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
LCII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LCII as "Hold", ARCB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.3% upside for LCII (target: $151) vs -3.8% for ARCB (target: $117). For income investors, LCII offers the higher dividend yield at 3.94% vs ARCB's 0.39%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $150.60 | $117.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.9% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.59 | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% | +2.8% |
LCII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARCB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CREV vs LCII vs ARCB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREV or LCII or ARCB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB). LCI Industries (LCII) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
On trailing P/E, LCI Industries (LCII) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus ArcBest Corporation at 46. 5x. On forward P/E, LCI Industries is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
Over the past 5 years, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) delivered a total return of +37.
1%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCB returned +627. 8% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LCI Industries (LCII) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 92β — meaning CREV is approximately 94% more volatile than LCII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 91% for LCI Industries — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus -4. 0% for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 1% for ArcBest Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREV leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
LCI Industries (LCII) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
6% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LCII leads at 6. 8% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCII leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CREV or LCII or ARCB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LCI Industries (LCII) trades at 13.
4x forward P/E versus 23. 6x for ArcBest Corporation — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCII: 29. 3% to $150. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CREV or LCII or ARCB?
In this comparison, LCII (3.
9% yield), ARCB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. CREV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CREV or LCII or ARCB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 3. 9% yield, +111. 5% 10Y return). Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LCII: +111. 5%, CREV: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CREV and LCII and ARCB?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREV (Consumer Cyclical) and LCII (Consumer Cyclical) and ARCB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; LCII is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LCII pays a dividend while CREV, ARCB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.