CRL vs ICLR

For growth investors, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the stronger pick with 2.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10.

7x.

Over the past 5 years, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) delivered a total return of -44.

8%, compared to -46. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRL returned +114. 0% versus ICLR's +90. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 64β — meaning ICLR is approximately 14% more volatile than CRL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is pulling ahead at 2.

0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ICON Public Limited Company grew EPS 28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ICLR leads at 14. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

6% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICLR leads at 13. 3% versus 12. 6% for CRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10.

7x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICLR: 22. 2% to $152. 13.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+114. 0% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRL: +114. 0%, ICLR: +90. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.