Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVCO vs PATK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
CVCO vs PATK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $4.74B | $3.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.20B | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 18.3x |
| Total Debt | $45M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $356M | $26M |
CVCO vs PATK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 263.1 | +163.1% |
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 277.3 | +177.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVCO vs PATK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 12.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 470.6% 10Y total return vs PATK's 407.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 3.00x
PATK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.51x
- Lower P/E (18.3x vs 21.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs PATK's 6.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.3x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs CVCO's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs CVCO's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.6% |
CVCO vs PATK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVCO vs PATK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PATK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 1.8x CVCO's $2.2B. CVCO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PATK's 3.5%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $221M | $445M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $205M | $194M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.1% | -0.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PATK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.2x trailing earnings, CVCO trades at a 2% valuation discount to PATK's 24.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PATK's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVCO's 21.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.16x | 24.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.00x | 18.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.13x | 10.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.88x | 2.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.17x | 12.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $12 for PATK. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.7% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.2% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.4% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$311M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $356M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 211.73x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PATK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $24,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,959 for PATK. Over the past 12 months, PATK leads with a +19.4% total return vs CVCO's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.9% vs CVCO's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.4% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +129.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.3% | +59.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +470.6% | +407.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +31.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVCO and PATK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PATK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVCO currently trades 70.2% from its 52-week high vs PATK's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $713.01 | $148.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $393.53 | $80.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +64.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 33.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 468K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVCO as "Buy" and PATK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.9% upside for PATK (target: $127) vs -5.1% for CVCO (target: $475). PATK is the only dividend payer here at 1.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $475.00 | $126.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +1.0% |
CVCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PATK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CVCO vs PATK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVCO or PATK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 3% for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK). Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) offers the better valuation at 24. 2x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVCO or PATK?
On trailing P/E, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is the cheapest at 24. 2x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Patrick Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVCO or PATK?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +140. 3%, compared to +59. 6% for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVCO returned +470. 6% versus PATK's +407. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVCO or PATK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning CVCO is approximately 29% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVCO or PATK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 6. 3% for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cavco Industries, Inc. grew EPS 12. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Patrick Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVCO or PATK?
Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVCO leads at 9. 4% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PATK leads at 23. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVCO or PATK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) trades at 18. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PATK: 31. 9% to $126. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVCO or PATK?
In this comparison, PATK (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CVCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVCO or PATK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 7% yield, +407. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +407. 9%, CVCO: +470. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVCO and PATK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PATK pays a dividend while CVCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.