Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVGI vs WLFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
CVGI vs WLFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $190M | $1.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $651M | $763M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $121M |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $145M | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33M | $16M |
CVGI vs WLFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Vehicle … (CVGI) | 100 | 205.3 | +105.3% |
| Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC) | 100 | 1133.2 | +1033.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVGI vs WLFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVGI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +477.2% vs WLFC's +79.1%
WLFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.66, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.4%
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs CVGI's 102.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% revenue growth vs CVGI's -10.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs CVGI's -2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.66 vs CVGI's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +477.2% vs WLFC's +79.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs CVGI's -4.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs 1.4% |
CVGI vs WLFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVGI vs WLFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLFC and CVGI operate at a comparable scale, with $763M and $651M in trailing revenue. WLFC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVGI's -2.7%. On growth, WLFC holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $651M | $763M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $273M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | -$277M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -36.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | +23.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.5% | +57.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CVGI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WLFC's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVGI's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $302M | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.75x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.43x | 13.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.60x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WLFC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WLFC delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CVGI. CVGI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WLFC's 3.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGI scores 5/9 vs WLFC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 3.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $145M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.02x | 1.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WLFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLFC five years ago would be worth $57,589 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,136 for CVGI. Over the past 12 months, CVGI leads with a +477.2% total return vs WLFC's +79.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLFC at 67.6% vs CVGI's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +244.0% | +78.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +477.2% | +79.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.1% | +370.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +475.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.9% | +888.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | +67.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WLFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WLFC is the less volatile stock with a 1.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVGI's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLFC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CVGI's 96.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.39 | $239.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.88 | $114.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 72.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 74K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVGI as "Hold" and WLFC as "Buy". WLFC is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.69 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
WLFC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CVGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CVGI vs WLFC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVGI or WLFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the stronger pick with 18.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 3% for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI). Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CVGI or WLFC?
Over the past 5 years, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) delivered a total return of +475.
9%, compared to -58. 6% for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLFC returned +888. 3% versus CVGI's +102. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CVGI or WLFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
66β versus Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning CVGI is approximately 28% more volatile than WLFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 4% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CVGI or WLFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is pulling ahead at 18.
7% versus -10. 3% for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 3% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLFC leads at 29. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CVGI or WLFC?
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
8% net margin versus -3. 5% for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLFC leads at 32. 3% versus 0. 7% for CVGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLFC leads at 65. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CVGI or WLFC?
In this comparison, WLFC (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CVGI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CVGI or WLFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+888.
3% 10Y return). Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLFC: +888. 3%, CVGI: +102. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CVGI and WLFC?
These companies operate in different sectors (CVGI (Consumer Cyclical) and WLFC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CVGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.