Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Application | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $178M | $41.40B | $42.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $490M | $5.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-12.36B | $801M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.1% | 75.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 94.2% | 0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.9x | 2.5x | 227.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $8.28B | $7.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2.30B | $11.29B |
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Asset Acqui… (DAAQ) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- -10.0% vs MSTR's -67.4%
- 4.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.9%
MSTR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 1.0%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs DAAQ's -10.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.85, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
COIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -53.1%
- 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
- 13.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 227.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.85 vs COIN's 3.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.0% vs MSTR's -67.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.9% |
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN and DAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $5.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $490M | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $480M | $248M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$12.4B | $801M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $7.6B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +68.1% | +75.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +94.2% | +0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -25.2% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.5% | +48.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -132.0% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, DAAQ trades at a 22% valuation discount to COIN's 35.9x P/E.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $41.4B | $42.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $177M | $47.4B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.92x | -8.14x | 35.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.47x | 227.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 23.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 86.74x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 0.71x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 17.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MSTR. MSTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COIN's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COIN scores 4/9 vs MSTR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -24.1% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | -19.4% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -9.9% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | -12.6% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $6.0B | -$3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2.3B | $11.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.3B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.05x | 11.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $20,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,683 for COIN. Over the past 12 months, DAAQ leads with a -10.0% total return vs MSTR's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 64.7% vs DAAQ's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -21.1% | -32.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.0% | -67.4% | -33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +346.4% | +216.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +107.1% | -33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +565.4% | -51.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +64.7% | +46.7% |
Risk & Volatility
DAAQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAAQ is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COIN's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAAQ currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 27.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 2.85x | 3.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.70 | $457.22 | $444.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $104.17 | $139.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +27.1% | +35.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 34.3 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 16.7M | 9.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSTR as "Buy", COIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.0% upside for MSTR (target: $252) vs 48.6% for COIN (target: $237). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $251.60 | $237.39 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
DAAQ vs MSTR vs COIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAAQ or MSTR or COIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. (DAAQ) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategy Inc (MSTR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
On trailing P/E, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +107.
1%, compared to -33. 2% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +565. 4% versus COIN's -51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning COIN is approximately -2803% more volatile than DAAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategy Inc (MSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 53% for Coinbase Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -151. 3% for Strategy Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAAQ or MSTR or COIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.
5x forward P/E versus 227. 9x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 225. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 103. 0% to $251. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAAQ or MSTR or COIN?
In this comparison, MSTR (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. DAAQ, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAAQ or MSTR or COIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12)). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAAQ: -10. 0%, COIN: -51. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAAQ and MSTR and COIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DAAQ (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and COIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MSTR pays a dividend while DAAQ, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.