DDL
Dingdong (Cayman) Limited
Grocery Stores
Market Cap$586M
5Y Perf.-93.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DDL vs JD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
JD
JD.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$47.20B
5Y Perf.-62.1%
DDL vs JD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DDL | JD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $586M | $47.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.90B | $1.30T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $331M | $32.20B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 1.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $89.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $887M | $108.35B |
DDL vs JD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DDL
JD
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dingdong (Cayman) L… (DDL) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DDL vs JD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DDL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. JD.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DDL
Dingdong (Cayman) Limited
The Income Pick
DDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.99
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 295.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 1.02x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JD
JD.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 40.2% 10Y total return vs DDL's -88.9%
- 2.5% margin vs DDL's 1.4%
- 2.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DDL | 15.5% revenue growth vs JD's 6.8% |
| Value | DDL | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 1.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | JD | 2.5% margin vs DDL's 1.4% |
| Stability / Safety | DDL | Beta 0.99 vs JD's 1.06 |
| Dividends | JD | 2.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DDL | +3.2% vs JD's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DDL | 4.8% ROA vs JD's 4.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 9.9% |
DDL vs JD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
DDL vs JD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDDLLAGGINGJD
JDJD.com, Inc.
1leads
DDLDingdong (Cayman) Lim…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs JDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DDL6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
JD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 54.6x DDL's $23.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.5% (JD) to 1.4% (DDL). On growth, JD holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.9B | $1.30T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $380M | $23.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $331M | $32.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $677M | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -56.3% |
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 41% valuation discount to DDL's 13.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JD's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDL's 18.6x.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $586M | $47.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $900M | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.13x | 7.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.30x | 1.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.63x | 6.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.32x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.81x | 7.27x |
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDL delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $11 for JD. JD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDL's 3.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDL scores 7/9 vs JD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.7% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.28x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$18.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $887M | $108.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $89.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.92x | 12.85x |
DDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JD five years ago would be worth $4,625 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for DDL. Over the past 12 months, DDL leads with a +3.2% total return vs JD's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JD at -2.3% vs DDL's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.2% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -6.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +40.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | -2.3% |
JD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JD's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs DDL's 76.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.41 | $38.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $24.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 573K | 10.0M |
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DDL as "Buy" and JD as "Buy". JD is the only dividend payer here at 2.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | DDLDingdong (Cayman)… | JDJD.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +8.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DDL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallDingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DDL vs JD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DDL or JD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DDL or JD?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Dingdong (Cayman) Limited at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DDL or JD?
Over the past 5 years, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) delivered a total return of -53. 8%, compared to -88. 9% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JD returned +48. 7% versus DDL's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DDL or JD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus JD. com, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning JD is approximately 8% more volatile than DDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JD. com, Inc. (JD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DDL or JD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus 6. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dingdong (Cayman) Limited grew EPS 295. 7% year-over-year, compared to 76. 5% for JD. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DDL or JD?
JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 1. 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JD leads at 3. 3% versus 0. 9% for DDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDL leads at 30. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DDL or JD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) trades at 1.
3x forward P/E versus 1. 4x for JD. com, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — DDL or JD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. DDL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DDL or JD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 7%, DDL: -89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DDL and JD?
These companies operate in different sectors (DDL (Consumer Defensive) and JD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JD pays a dividend while DDL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DDL: 6.7% · JD: 14.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(DDL: 13.1x · JD: 7.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.