DFLI vs CLNE vs SHLS

For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 3% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) delivered a total return of -72. 8%, compared to -97. 7% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLNE returned -26. 9% versus DFLI's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clean Energy Fuels Corp.

(CLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. 's 2. 63β — meaning DFLI is approximately 121% more volatile than CLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 29% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -21. 3% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHLS leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -80. 2% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -50. 9% for DFLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHLS leads at 35. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFLI: 315.

5% to $8. 60.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.

(CLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) carries a higher beta of 2. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLNE: -26. 9%, DFLI: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (DFLI (Industrials) and CLNE (Energy) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DFLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.