Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Aerospace & Defense
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Infrastructure | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | — | $315.76B | $18.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $5.22B | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $2.28B | $345M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 84.1% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.5% | 38.1% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 96.9x | 43.9x |
| Total Debt | $302K | $229M | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $257K | $1.42B | $503M |
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEFSEC Technologies… (DFSCW) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.3% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 101.1 | +1.1% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DFSCW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.43
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 1.43, current ratio 0.62x
PLTR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 56.2%, EPS growth 231.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs BWXT's 5.4%
- 56.2% revenue growth vs BWXT's 18.3%
BWXT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (43.9x vs 96.9x)
- 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- +91.2% vs DFSCW's -25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.2% revenue growth vs BWXT's 18.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (43.9x vs 96.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs DFSCW's -494.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs PLTR's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.2% vs DFSCW's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs DFSCW's -94.6%, ROIC 22.3% vs -243.5% |
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories
BWXT leads 1 • DFSCW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 3472.8x DFSCW's $2M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFSCW's -4.9%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $5.2B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $2.0B | $458M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $2.3B | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $2.7B | $328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +84.1% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +38.1% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +43.7% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +51.5% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +84.7% | +26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.1% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 57.2x trailing earnings, BWXT trades at a 74% valuation discount to PLTR's 218.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWXT's 47.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLTR's 218.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $315.8B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $314.6B | $20.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 218.73x | 57.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 96.90x | 43.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 218.43x | 47.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 70.55x | 5.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 47.21x | 15.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 150.32x | 63.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DFSCW. PLTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs DFSCW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +31.7% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -94.6% | +26.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +22.3% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +21.6% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.03x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45,395 | -$1.2B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256,828 | $1.4B | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302,223 | $229M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.15x | — | 10.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $74,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,475 for DFSCW. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +91.2% total return vs DFSCW's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 161.1% vs DFSCW's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | -17.9% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | +15.7% | +91.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.2% | +1680.4% | +220.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +646.1% | +218.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +1350.5% | +538.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.2% | +161.1% | +47.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DFSCW and BWXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DFSCW is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTR's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWXT currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs DFSCW's 42.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.69x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.07 | $207.52 | $241.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $112.07 | $105.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.8% | +66.4% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 44.9 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 46.3M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLTR as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for PLTR (target: $192) vs -0.2% for BWXT (target: $205). BWXT is the only dividend payer here at 0.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $191.83 | $205.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.0% | +0.2% |
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWXT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DFSCW vs PLTR vs BWXT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 3% for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) offers the better valuation at 57. 2x trailing P/E (43. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
On trailing P/E, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the cheapest at 57. 2x versus Palantir Technologies Inc. at 218. 7x. On forward P/E, BWX Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 43. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +646. 1%, compared to -25. 3% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. Warrant (DFSCW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1351% versus DFSCW's -25. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DEFSEC Technologies Inc.
Warrant (DFSCW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus Palantir Technologies Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning PLTR is approximately 19% more volatile than DFSCW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus 18. 3% for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for BWX Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLTR leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -494. 4% for DEFSEC Technologies Inc. Warrant — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31. 6% versus -651. 4% for DFSCW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) trades at 43. 9x forward P/E versus 96. 9x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 53. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLTR: 39. 2% to $191. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. DFSCW, PLTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DFSCW or PLTR or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1351% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLTR: +1351%, DFSCW: -25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DFSCW and PLTR and BWXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DFSCW (Financial Services) and PLTR (Technology) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.