Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DKNG vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
DKNG vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $11.86B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.05B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 94.0x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.93B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.60B | $687M |
DKNG vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DKNG vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.12
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 144.1% 10Y total return vs PENN's 13.6%
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (22.9x vs 94.0x)
- +7.9% vs DKNG's -28.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.9x vs 94.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs DKNG's -28.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs 1.8% |
DKNG vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DKNG vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN and DKNG operate at a comparable scale, with $7.0B and $6.1B in trailing revenue. DKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $612M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.8% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.9% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PENN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 46.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.9B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2953.09x | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 94.03x | 22.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.94x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.78x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. DKNG carries lower financial leverage with a 3.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.06x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $330M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKNG five years ago would be worth $4,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,996 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +7.9% total return vs DKNG's -28.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at -0.4% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.8% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | -35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | -80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.1% | +13.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKNG and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 49.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.46 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +81.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.8M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DKNG as "Buy" and PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs 18.7% for PENN (target: $20).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.88 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +15.8% |
DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DKNG vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DKNG or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DKNG or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) delivered a total return of -53. 9%, compared to -80. 0% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +144. 1% versus PENN's +13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DKNG or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 20% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DKNG or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DKNG or PENN?
DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PENN leads at 3. 9% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKNG leads at 41. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DKNG or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) trades at 22. 9x forward P/E versus 94. 0x for DraftKings Inc. — 71. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 54. 2% to $36. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — DKNG or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is DKNG or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKNG: +144. 1%, PENN: +13. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DKNG and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.