Chemicals
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
DOW vs LYB vs HUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
DOW vs LYB vs HUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $27.71B | $23.67B | $2.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.33B | $22.48B | $5.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.76B | $-774M | $-324M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | -19.3% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -0.9% | -1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 10.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $19.60B | $15.96B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.82B | $3.45B | $429M |
DOW vs LYB vs HUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 115.2 | +15.2% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 83.2 | -16.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOW vs LYB vs HUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
LYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.5%
- 49.4% 10Y total return vs HUN's 50.8%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.5%, current ratio 1.77x
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -5.8%, EPS growth -44.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.9%
- -5.8% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.8% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.4% margin vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUN's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.1% vs HUN's +38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC -1.1% vs 0.6% |
DOW vs LYB vs HUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOW vs LYB vs HUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 6.9x HUN's $5.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.4% (LYB) to -7.0% (DOW). On growth, HUN holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.3B | $22.5B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $865M | $160M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.8B | -$774M | -$324M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.0B | $3.1B | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -19.3% | +12.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -0.9% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -3.4% | -5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +13.6% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | -100.0% | +0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.2% | -100.0% | -3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DOW's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 34.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.7B | $23.7B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43.5B | $36.2B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.43x | -31.27x | -9.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.02x | 10.19x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.06x | 34.04x | 19.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 0.79x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 2.32x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 61.65x | 22.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYB delivers a -7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. HUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOW scores 3/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.4% | -7.2% | -8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -3.0% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -1.1% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -1.1% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 1.56x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | $12.5B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $3.4B | $429M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.6B | $16.0B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.51x | -1.42x | -1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYB five years ago would be worth $9,035 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,210 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, LYB leads with a +40.1% total return vs HUN's +38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYB at -1.1% vs HUN's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.1% | +67.1% | +49.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +40.1% | +38.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.3% | -3.4% | -31.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.5% | -9.6% | -37.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +49.4% | +50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.4% | -1.1% | -12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYB and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs LYB's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.38x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.74 | $83.94 | $15.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.40 | $41.58 | $7.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +87.5% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 60.4 | 64.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.3M | 8.1M | 6.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOW as "Hold", LYB as "Hold", HUN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.7% upside for DOW (target: $40) vs -20.5% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.46% vs DOW's 5.44%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.55 | $73.60 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 39 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +7.5% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.09 | $5.48 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
LYB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HUN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
DOW vs LYB vs HUN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOW or LYB or HUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is the stronger pick with -5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Analysts rate Dow Inc. (DOW) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DOW or LYB or HUN?
Over the past 5 years, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) delivered a total return of -9. 6%, compared to -37. 9% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUN returned +50. 8% versus DOW's +14. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DOW or LYB or HUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning HUN is approximately 355% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DOW or LYB or HUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is pulling ahead at -5.
8% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUN leads at -10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DOW or LYB or HUN?
LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 5% net margin versus -6. 6% for Dow Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOW leads at 0. 7% versus -1. 1% for LYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUN leads at 13. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DOW or LYB or HUN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Dow Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOW: 2. 7% to $39. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — DOW or LYB or HUN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB) offers the highest yield at 7. 5%, versus 5. 4% for Dow Inc. (DOW).
08Is DOW or LYB or HUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 5% yield). Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +49. 4%, HUN: +50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DOW and LYB and HUN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.