Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DOX vs CNXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
DOX vs CNXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $6.94B | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.58B | $9.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $572M | $-1.28B |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.7% | 6.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $826M | $4.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325M | $327M |
DOX vs CNXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amdocs Limited (DOX) | 100 | 97.2 | -2.8% |
| Concentrix Corporat… (CNXC) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOX vs CNXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 3.1%
- 36.3% 10Y total return vs CNXC's -63.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 23.8%, current ratio 1.17x
CNXC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- Beta 1.38, yield 6.0%, current ratio 1.40x
- 2.2% revenue growth vs DOX's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% revenue growth vs DOX's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.5% margin vs CNXC's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs CNXC's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CNXC's 6.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -26.9% vs CNXC's -50.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs CNXC's -10.8%, ROIC 15.6% vs 5.6% |
DOX vs CNXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOX vs CNXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNXC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 2.1x DOX's $4.6B. DOX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNXC's -13.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $9.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $773M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $572M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $755M | $572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +6.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | -14.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CNXC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CNXC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DOX's 7.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.67x | -1.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.58x | 2.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.30x | 4.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.75x | 2.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOX delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-33 for CNXC. DOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNXC's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOX scores 6/9 vs CNXC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | -33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | -10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.6% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $501M | $4.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $325M | $327M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $826M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.45x | -3.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DOX five years ago would be worth $9,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for CNXC. Over the past 12 months, DOX leads with a -26.9% total return vs CNXC's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOX at -8.2% vs CNXC's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | -40.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.9% | -50.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | -81.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.3% | -63.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | -31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
DOX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNXC's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOX currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs CNXC's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.41 | $62.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.75 | $22.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +38.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DOX and CNXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DOX as "Buy" and CNXC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.2% upside for CNXC (target: $52) vs 40.7% for DOX (target: $90). For income investors, CNXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.00% vs DOX's 3.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $52.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.01 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | +11.3% |
DOX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DOX vs CNXC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOX or CNXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is the stronger pick with 2.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Amdocs Limited (DOX). Amdocs Limited (DOX) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amdocs Limited (DOX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOX or CNXC?
On forward P/E, Concentrix Corporation is actually cheaper at 2.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOX or CNXC?
Over the past 5 years, Amdocs Limited (DOX) delivered a total return of -5.
2%, compared to -81. 0% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOX returned +36. 3% versus CNXC's -63. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOX or CNXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amdocs Limited (DOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus Concentrix Corporation's 1. 38β — meaning CNXC is approximately 140% more volatile than DOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amdocs Limited (DOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 169% for Concentrix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOX or CNXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is pulling ahead at 2.
2% versus -9. 4% for Amdocs Limited (DOX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amdocs Limited grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to -648. 8% for Concentrix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNXC leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOX or CNXC?
Amdocs Limited (DOX) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -13. 0% for Concentrix Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOX leads at 18. 2% versus 6. 2% for CNXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOX leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOX or CNXC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) trades at 2.
0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Amdocs Limited — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNXC: 119. 2% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOX or CNXC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 0%, versus 3. 1% for Amdocs Limited (DOX).
09Is DOX or CNXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amdocs Limited (DOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOX: +36. 3%, CNXC: -63. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOX and CNXC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DOX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.