Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $52M | $1.69B | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $697M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $34M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 30.9% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 8.0% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4.7x | 35.5x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $48M | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $83M | $3M |
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deswell Industries,… (DSWL) | 100 | 135.6 | +35.6% |
| Preformed Line Prod… (PLPC) | 100 | 697.7 | +597.7% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 5.45x
- Beta 0.20, yield 6.1%, current ratio 5.45x
PLPC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs DSWL's 210.5%
- +159.0% vs DSWL's +55.6%
LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- PEG 1.32 vs PLPC's 9.84
- 22.1% revenue growth vs DSWL's -2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs DSWL's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 35.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs LYTS's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs PLPC's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PLPC's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.0% vs DSWL's +55.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs PLPC's 5.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 9.8% |
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSWL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLPC leads 1 • LYTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DSWL and PLPC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $697M annually — 5.1x DSWL's $137M. DSWL is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYTS's 4.3%. On growth, PLPC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $697M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $73M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $34M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $35M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +30.9% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +8.0% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +4.9% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +5.0% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +18.7% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.2% | -8.2% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DSWL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, DSWL trades at a 90% valuation discount to PLPC's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LYTS offers better value at 1.82x vs PLPC's 13.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $1.7B | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $1.7B | $823M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.67x | 48.39x | 30.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.51x | 22.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.40x | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.96x | 21.22x | 17.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 2.53x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 3.59x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.95x | 50.75x | 21.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DSWL and PLPC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DSWL delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for PLPC. PLPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYTS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSWL scores 7/9 vs LYTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +7.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.7% | +5.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +9.8% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +11.0% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$35M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $83M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $48M | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.48x | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLPC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLPC five years ago would be worth $50,171 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,756 for DSWL. Over the past 12 months, PLPC leads with a +159.0% total return vs DSWL's +55.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLPC at 34.7% vs DSWL's 11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +63.2% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.6% | +159.0% | +58.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.2% | +144.2% | +100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.6% | +401.7% | +223.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.5% | +794.9% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.9% | +34.7% | +26.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSWL and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DSWL is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLPC's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs DSWL's 73.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 1.70x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.48 | $371.80 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.93 | $132.15 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +92.9% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 64.9 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 165K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
DSWL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLPC as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -20.4% for PLPC (target: $275). For income investors, DSWL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.11% vs PLPC's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +0.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.83 | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
DSWL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). PLPC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DSWL vs PLPC vs LYTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL). Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
On trailing P/E, Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Preformed Line Products Company at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, LSI Industries Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LSI Industries Inc. wins at 1. 32x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 84x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) delivered a total return of +401.
7%, compared to +7. 6% for Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLPC returned +796. 9% versus LYTS's +109. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 24β versus Preformed Line Products Company's 1. 70β — meaning PLPC is approximately 597% more volatile than DSWL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 29% for LSI Industries Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -2. 5% for Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deswell Industries, Inc. grew EPS 45. 8% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 4. 3% for LSI Industries Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLPC leads at 8. 2% versus 4. 9% for DSWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLPC leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 84x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 35. 5x for Preformed Line Products Company — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DSWL or PLPC or LYTS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC).
09Is DSWL or PLPC or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deswell Industries, Inc.
(DSWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 24), 6. 1% yield, +218. 9% 10Y return). Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DSWL: +218. 9%, PLPC: +796. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DSWL and PLPC and LYTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DSWL (Technology) and PLPC (Industrials) and LYTS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DSWL is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. DSWL, LYTS pay a dividend while PLPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.