Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ELE vs RGLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
ELE vs RGLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $1.20B | $16.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 62.6% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 64.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.3x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $489K | $966M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $234M |
Quick Verdict: ELE vs RGLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 185.8%, EPS growth 435.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 68.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 6.58x
- 185.8% revenue growth vs RGLD's 44.6%
RGLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 0.7%
- 331.4% 10Y total return vs ELE's 26.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 0.7%, current ratio 3.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 185.8% revenue growth vs RGLD's 44.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 34.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.5% margin vs ELE's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs ELE's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.4% vs ELE's +26.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs ELE's 0.4%, ROIC 9.2% vs 1.2% |
ELE vs RGLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ELE vs RGLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 29.8x ELE's $44M. RGLD is the more profitable business, keeping 48.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELE's 3.9%. On growth, ELE holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.6% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +64.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +48.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.6% | -18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +144.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +91.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RGLD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.0x trailing earnings, RGLD trades at a 89% valuation discount to ELE's 325.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RGLD's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ELE's 152.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $16.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $17.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 325.74x | 35.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.30x | 20.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 152.81x | 20.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.91x | 16.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGLD delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $0 for ELE. ELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGLD's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELE scores 7/9 vs RGLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$53M | $732M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $489,000 | $966M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.40x | 52.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RGLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGLD five years ago would be worth $20,171 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,613 for ELE. Over the past 12 months, RGLD leads with a +46.4% total return vs ELE's +26.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGLD at 21.4% vs ELE's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | +9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.1% | +46.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +78.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +101.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +331.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RGLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RGLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELE's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGLD currently trades 78.6% from its 52-week high vs ELE's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.96 | $306.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.58 | $150.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 297K | 987K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
RGLD is the only dividend payer here at 0.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $315.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RGLD leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
ELE vs RGLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELE or RGLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock (ELE) is the stronger pick with 185.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offers the better valuation at 36. 0x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELE or RGLD?
On trailing P/E, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the cheapest at 36. 0x versus Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock at 325. 7x. On forward P/E, Royal Gold, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELE or RGLD?
Over the past 5 years, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) delivered a total return of +101. 7%, compared to +26. 1% for Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock (ELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGLD returned +331. 4% versus ELE's +26. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELE or RGLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock's 2. 14β — meaning ELE is approximately 194% more volatile than RGLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock (ELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Royal Gold, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELE or RGLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock (ELE) is pulling ahead at 185.
8% versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock grew EPS 435. 9% year-over-year, compared to 32. 5% for Royal Gold, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELE leads at 68. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELE or RGLD?
Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 2% net margin versus 4. 1% for Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock — meaning it keeps 45. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RGLD leads at 64. 5% versus 16. 8% for ELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RGLD leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELE or RGLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 3x for Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELE or RGLD?
In this comparison, RGLD (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ELE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELE or RGLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Royal Gold, Inc.
(RGLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 7% yield, +331. 4% 10Y return). Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock (ELE) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RGLD: +331. 4%, ELE: +26. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELE and RGLD?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RGLD pays a dividend while ELE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.