EPRT vs NTST

For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.

(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 25. 0% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.

(EPRT) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 257. 1x. On forward P/E, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus NETSTREIT Corp. 's 1. 12x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.

(EPRT) delivered a total return of +44. 2%, compared to +17. 5% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +189. 7% versus NTST's +41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.

(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus NETSTREIT Corp. 's 0. 05β — meaning NTST is approximately 464% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.

(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 25. 0% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 11. 3% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.

(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 3. 5% for NETSTREIT Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 25. 7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus NETSTREIT Corp. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) trades at 24. 1x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 2% to $36. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 3. 7% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.

(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +189. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +189. 7%, NTST: +41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.